Many people have asked me similar questions: How does Polkadot gradually lose its halo from the past?
Looking back at the development trajectory over the past few years, I think Polkadot has actually encountered a mismatch in the industry. The most straightforward way to say this is: when developers were still desperately in need of smart contracts, Polkadot had already rolled out a complete set of self-built chain platforms and infrastructure. Gavin Wood's vision was very forward-looking, directly skipping the smart contract step and rushing towards a chain-level architecture, but he may have overestimated the overall technical level of developers worldwide.
The result is quite interesting——Polkadot's architectural philosophy has always been ahead of the market. Those concepts it proposed early on often only get rediscovered by the industry two or three years later and are then promoted as new narratives. The advantage of being first actually becomes invisibility.
For developers, there is a fundamental contradiction within the Polkadot ecosystem. On one hand, its design's advanced nature is undisputed: multi-chain collaboration, shared security, XCM cross-chain interoperability, system chain asset standards… all of these are truly foundational infrastructure capabilities, done very hardcore. But on the other hand, many developers will directly ask: "I just want to write an application, why do I have to learn how to build a blockchain first?"
This question seems simple but is actually fatal. It directly leads to a consequence: a large number of developers ultimately choose those smart contract ecosystems with lower barriers and easier entry, such as some leading EVM-compatible chains.
The emergence of Polkadot Hub is precisely to break this deadlock.
In my opinion, Hub is not a packaging of a new concept, nor another round of marketing narrative. It is more like the key puzzle piece that finally completes the Polkadot ecosystem——filling the gap between "writing smart contract applications" and "developing a complete blockchain from scratch," which are two completely different levels of difficulty.
What does this mean? It means that more developers who do not want to build their own chain but only want to develop applications can now enter the Polkadot ecosystem with lower technical barriers. They no longer have to face complex chain-level development from the start but can gradually deepen from the relatively familiar application layer.
This may be the key step for Polkadot to re-close the distance with the market.
قد تحتوي هذه الصفحة على محتوى من جهات خارجية، يتم تقديمه لأغراض إعلامية فقط (وليس كإقرارات/ضمانات)، ولا ينبغي اعتباره موافقة على آرائه من قبل Gate، ولا بمثابة نصيحة مالية أو مهنية. انظر إلى إخلاء المسؤولية للحصول على التفاصيل.
تسجيلات الإعجاب 16
أعجبني
16
5
إعادة النشر
مشاركة
تعليق
0/400
GasBandit
· منذ 4 س
بصراحة، مسألة Polkadot كانت ببساطة في وقت غير مناسب، التقدم المفرط أصبح عبئًا في النهاية
هذه الحيلة في Hub أراها متأخرة قليلاً، لماذا لم تفعل ذلك في وقت سابق...
وبالحديث عن الأمر، حتى لو كانت التقنية رائعة، لا فائدة منها، المطورون فقط يريدون الكتابة والإطلاق، من يهتم ببنيتك التحتية القوية جدًا
شاهد النسخة الأصليةرد0
WhaleStalker
· منذ 4 س
说白了就是太理想主义了,现实没跟上Gavin的脑子
هل يمكن أن ينقذ Hub؟ علامة استفهام
كان ينبغي أن نكمل هذه القطعة من اللغز منذ زمن، وإلا لماذا يختار المطورون Solana
بالحديث عن ذلك، حتى لو كانت البنية التحتية متطورة، فإن قاعدة المستخدمين لن تتابعها
لنرى هل يمكن حقًا تقليل العتبة، لا تكرر الكلام النظري فقط
في الواقع، لقد تأخرنا، لو كانت لدينا هذه الفكرة في ذلك الوقت...
بالتأكيد سيكون هناك من يجرؤ على التجربة، المهم أن يكون Hub فعلاً سهل الاستخدام
تحول ميزة الإطلاق المبكر إلى عبء، وهذا فعلاً أمر ساخر
يبدو جيدًا، لكن هل يمكن أن يزداد شعبية النظام البيئي؟
قولك صحيح، بولكادوت فعلاً لم يحالفه الحظ. التقنية رائعة لكن لا يمكن مقاومة رغبة المطورين في الانضمام بسرعة، من لديه الصبر الكافي لتعلم تطوير السلسلة معك، أليس من الأفضل أن تذهب مباشرة إلى Solidity؟
Many people have asked me similar questions: How does Polkadot gradually lose its halo from the past?
Looking back at the development trajectory over the past few years, I think Polkadot has actually encountered a mismatch in the industry. The most straightforward way to say this is: when developers were still desperately in need of smart contracts, Polkadot had already rolled out a complete set of self-built chain platforms and infrastructure. Gavin Wood's vision was very forward-looking, directly skipping the smart contract step and rushing towards a chain-level architecture, but he may have overestimated the overall technical level of developers worldwide.
The result is quite interesting——Polkadot's architectural philosophy has always been ahead of the market. Those concepts it proposed early on often only get rediscovered by the industry two or three years later and are then promoted as new narratives. The advantage of being first actually becomes invisibility.
For developers, there is a fundamental contradiction within the Polkadot ecosystem. On one hand, its design's advanced nature is undisputed: multi-chain collaboration, shared security, XCM cross-chain interoperability, system chain asset standards… all of these are truly foundational infrastructure capabilities, done very hardcore. But on the other hand, many developers will directly ask: "I just want to write an application, why do I have to learn how to build a blockchain first?"
This question seems simple but is actually fatal. It directly leads to a consequence: a large number of developers ultimately choose those smart contract ecosystems with lower barriers and easier entry, such as some leading EVM-compatible chains.
The emergence of Polkadot Hub is precisely to break this deadlock.
In my opinion, Hub is not a packaging of a new concept, nor another round of marketing narrative. It is more like the key puzzle piece that finally completes the Polkadot ecosystem——filling the gap between "writing smart contract applications" and "developing a complete blockchain from scratch," which are two completely different levels of difficulty.
What does this mean? It means that more developers who do not want to build their own chain but only want to develop applications can now enter the Polkadot ecosystem with lower technical barriers. They no longer have to face complex chain-level development from the start but can gradually deepen from the relatively familiar application layer.
This may be the key step for Polkadot to re-close the distance with the market.