09:10 Observing TRUMPUSDT: Current price 3.605, 24h -2.80%. Sentiment is cold (Fear&Greed 26). In this environment, "rebounds that don't continue/breaks that pull back" oscillations are more likely to occur. So I prefer to clarify the framework first, react to price levels, rather than guess direction based on emotion.

I'm only watching two key levels: A Confirmation level 3.76900000, B Breakdown level 3.59200000. When price is below A, I treat it as a retest phase and prioritize observing volume and pullback speed; only if we effectively break above A and hold it can it upgrade from "observing" to "considering following". Conversely, if it breaks below B again and stays there, the short-term must acknowledge weakness—I'd rather do less than overextend.

By the way, there's been lots of news recently about geopolitical conflicts and regulatory stances, but I only treat it as background noise, not verified fact, and definitely not trading signals. These narrative coins are more easily moved by news—the more buzz there is, the more I need to restrain position size and trade frequency. This is not a confirmation signal, just an observation framework.

For reference only, not investment advice.

Would you prefer to see it stabilize first above B before talking about rebounds, or directly gain volume and break above A before considering participation?