Mengapa Model Keamanan Mitosis Menonjol dalam Keuangan Lintas Rantai

Bridge hacks have wiped out over $2B in crypto assets. The problem? Most protocols treat security as an afterthought, not architecture.

Mitosis flips this. Their security model gets stronger as TVL increases — the opposite of most systems.

The Lego Blocks Approach

Instead of being locked into one security provider, Mitosis uses Hyperlane’s modular Interchain Security Modules (ISMs). Think of it like choosing your own security toolkit instead of buying a pre-made house. You get:

• Current setup: delegated Proof-of-Stake validators
• Near future: Ethereum restaking via EigenLayer — this is the big one. Imagine borrowing Ethereum’s entire economic security layer to validate cross-chain messages. That’s a serious moat against attacks.

The Collateral Twist

Here’s where it gets interesting. Mitosis introduced a Validator Collateral System (VCS) that flips traditional staking on its head:

Traditional model: delegators get slashed, validators go home rich

Mitosis model: validators post their own collateral, so they actually lose money if they mess up

This isn’t theoretical — it means validators have real skin in the game. Their incentives align with network health. Uptime goes up, dishonest behavior becomes economically irrational.

The Three-Layer Stack

1. Validator collateral = accountability
2. Restaked ETH security = economic moat
3. Hyperlane ISM flexibility = no vendor lock-in

For users, this means one thing: your cross-chain assets are backed by multiple, overlapping security layers. As Mitosis TVL grows, the security actually strengthens instead of degrading.

That’s the opposite of how most bridges work.