Let's talk about hashrate distribution and what actual decentralization means. BTC's mining power isn't controlled by any single entity holding 50% — that's the whole point.

Some people argue: "If BTC has limited real-world usage but maintains its valuation, why can't XRP — which claims it'll power global financial settlements — be worth the same?"

Here's the problem with that logic: you're comparing fundamentally different value propositions. One is built on provable decentralization through distributed computational power. The other? XRPL's architecture raises serious questions about actual decentralization.

When a project positions itself as the future backbone of international finance yet lacks the same degree of distributed control, that's not just a technical difference — it's a structural one that directly impacts how we should evaluate its worth.