💥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinTRUST 💥
Post original content on Gate Square related to TRUST or the CandyDrop campaign for a chance to share 13,333 TRUST in rewards!
📅 Event Period: Nov 6, 2025 – Nov 16, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 Related Campaign:
CandyDrop 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47990
📌 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post original content related to TRUST or the CandyDrop event.
2️⃣ Content must be at least 80 words.
3️⃣ Add the hashtag #PostToWinTRUST
4️⃣ Include a screenshot showing your CandyDrop participation.
🏆 Rewards (Total: 13,333 TRUST)
🥇 1st Prize (1 winner): 3,833
There's a chart making rounds online that's supposedly showing how AI will devastate the job market. It's getting massive attention, shared everywhere like it's some kind of prophecy. But here's the thing—some analysts are calling it 'possibly the most misleading visualization in recent memory.'
Why? The chart oversimplifies incredibly complex economic dynamics. It cherry-picks data points, ignores historical context of technological transitions, and presents correlation as causation. Jobs don't just vanish in a vacuum. When automation hits one sector, new roles emerge elsewhere. Remember when ATMs were supposed to eliminate bank tellers? Spoiler: there are more tellers now than before ATMs existed.
The real story isn't about jobs disappearing—it's about transformation. AI will reshape work, absolutely. But fearmongering with flawed data visualization doesn't help anyone prepare. We need nuanced analysis, not panic-inducing graphics that ignore how markets actually adapt.
What's your take? Are we overreacting to AI's impact on employment, or is the concern justified despite questionable data?