#数字资产市场动态 Malicious Address Recognition Becomes a Standard in Wallets, Security Defense Further Upgraded



Recently, there has been industry discussion suggesting that crypto wallets should take on more responsibility for risk prevention. Simply put: before users make a transfer, wallets should be able to automatically identify and alert known scam addresses, or even directly intercept the transaction. This is not a new concept, but there are still few products that have truly implemented it.

Some leading exchanges' wallets have already put this mechanism into place—when a user attempts to transfer to a blacklisted address, the system immediately pops up a risk warning. It sounds simple, but the underlying logic is quite complex. You need to maintain a real-time malicious address database and have the ability to update it continuously. What would be an ideal solution? The industry could establish a joint security information sharing mechanism, where everyone collaborates to maintain a blacklist database that wallet providers can access.

This idea is quite good, but what about reality? Competitive pressure is there. Wallet software developers compete with each other, and truly collaborating to maintain a unified scam address database is easier said than done—each has their own concerns. But on the other hand, someone has already taken the lead, and that’s progress.

For ordinary users, this kind of security upgrade is truly a blessing. Many beginners have lost their assets due to a wrong address—it's heartbreaking. If wallets can help screen these risks, at least they can block a large portion of low-level scams. Of course, this also highlights an important issue: in the crypto market, self-protection awareness always comes first. Wallet protection is just the second line of defense; your own vigilance is the final fortress.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterWangvip
· 8h ago
Honest words, this feature should have been available long ago. How many people have been scammed? --- Alright, another "security upgrade," but it's always better than nothing. --- Wallets still operate independently; just thinking about a joint defense line makes it clear how difficult it is. --- Honestly, you still have to rely on your own vigilance. Don't put all your hopes on the wallet. --- The good news for beginners is real, but that can't be an excuse to shift blame. --- The blacklist database can't keep up with the speed at which scammers change their disguises. --- It's always good when leading exchanges act quickly; others are still sleeping. --- Cooperation and sharing sound nice, but in reality, no one wants to share the real secrets. --- Having something is better than nothing, just don't be brainwashed into thinking this can solve all problems.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKeyvip
· 9h ago
Another set of security defenses, sounds good but how many people can they really stop? In the end, it still depends on oneself to be more cautious.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumpervip
· 9h ago
It should have been standard equipment long ago, otherwise newcomers are too easily exploited. --- Sharing blacklists sounds good, but each wallet wants to be the boss, making cooperation difficult. --- You still have to rely on your own vigilance; wallet protection can only do so much. --- How do major exchanges maintain their blacklist databases? It's hard to tell if they're reliable. --- The good news is there has been progress; the bad news is that this feature should have been available a long time ago. --- At the end of the day, self-protection comes first; don't expect wallets to bear the responsibility for you. --- Real-time updating of blacklists sounds simple, but how are data sources and accuracy guaranteed? --- I like this direction, but there are actually not many implementations in the ecosystem, so it still needs time. --- If a newbie sends to the wrong address once, it's gone. Having this prompt at least can prevent some losses. --- Competition is fierce, and joint maintenance of blacklists is basically impossible; each operates independently.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWangvip
· 9h ago
Exactly right, self-protection is the key. No matter how powerful the wallet is, it can't save careless users.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)