OpenAI's Chief Financial Officer recently publicly stated that they hope the US government will play a larger role in future financing. This move reflects a phenomenon—leading tech companies have gradually involved all parties in the supply chain, from major technology firms to policymakers, forming a tightly knit web of vested interests. Market observers believe that if government capital truly enters the AI financing sector on a large scale, the tech industry as a whole might welcome it.



But it's worth pondering that AI is essentially more like a magnifying glass. It amplifies productivity and innovation speed, but also magnifies the rigidity of the system itself; it unleashes the potential of productivity, while also intensifying the profit-seeking impulses of capital. This duality may be the aspect we truly need to observe.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Whisperervip
· 6h ago
Government bailout? That's just the game rules; in the end, taxpayers are the ones footing the bill.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntressvip
· 6h ago
Another tactic of capital manipulation, when the government steps in, everyone feels good. --- After research and analysis, this is a textbook case of interest binding. --- Magnifying glass? I think it just speeds up the harvest of the little guys. --- Data shows that after large-scale financing, the probability of suspicious backgrounds of project teams rises sharply. Caution is advised. --- Don't be greedy; government intervention instead indicates that the bubble is about to burst. --- The tokenomics design is so complicated, just to prevent retail investors from seeing through it. --- Historical data shows that every "strategic financing" is a signal before escape. Is it worth positioning? I don't think so.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRichesvip
· 6h ago
This is a classic case of a snake swallowing an elephant, ultimately a collusion between capital and power. Government intervention? Ha, in the end, who benefits if not those big players. The part about the AI magnifying glass is correct, but the question is who can restrain this mirror. No one really wants to regulate it—doesn't making money together feel better? Another new power game, retail investors are still the ones being cut.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamotovip
· 6h ago
Government intervention? Basically, they want to socialize the risks, while keeping the profits for themselves.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopVIPvip
· 6h ago
The government pays, but in the end, it's still the retail investors who foot the bill.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)