🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
#AI与加密融合 Seeing the news about Surf's funding, some memories from 2017 flashed through my mind. Back then, the ICO wave was rising, and many projects could raise tens of millions just with a well-crafted white paper, but most of them eventually faded into obscurity. Today, the combination of AI and crypto looks fresh on the surface, but essentially nothing has changed — the key still lies in whether the real pain points of users are addressed.
This time, Surf's $15 million funding is worth a close look. Not because of the large amount, but because it addresses a very specific problem: the illusion of general AI in the crypto space. This is a failure pattern I’ve seen repeatedly over the past decade — impressive technology but not aligned with the actual needs of vertical markets. Successful projects like BitMEX and Uniswap understood the particularities of their domains deeply, rather than blindly applying generic solutions.
Surf's performance in the CAIA benchmark test is four times faster than ChatGPT and Grok, and this gap is real. Data shows that within just a few months, it has attracted 80,000 users, generated 1 million research reports, and maintained a 50% monthly growth rate — these aren’t inflated numbers from hype, but actual usage metrics. The investment logic of firms like Pantera, Coinbase Ventures, and DCG is also clear: they are betting on the specialization of AI toolchains.
However, I also see risks. In 2018, I saw too many "ChatGPT for [specific domain]" projects that ultimately failed due to commercialization bottlenecks. Surf hasn't issued tokens yet, and while its user base is growing, it’s still far from explosive growth. The real test is whether it can expand its user base while maintaining information accuracy and competitiveness. On-chain data integration and multi-chain support are not technological miracles; the key lies in continuous data quality maintenance and model iteration.
At least this project avoids repeating the mistakes of past failures — overhyping concepts and neglecting fundamentals. Surf is taking a grounded, refined, and expansion-oriented approach. It’s worth watching, but not overly optimistic. History has shown that true winners often reveal their potential only in the second round of funding.