🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Someone in the group woke me up with a sentence: Institutions not going on-chain is not because of volatility, but because they are afraid that "every step has to be taken with their own scapegoat."
In the past, they wanted to create a complete process: deposit with USDC/USDT → buy RWA → cross-chain rebalancing → compliant distribution. However, each step was scattered across different systems, standards were inconsistent, responsibilities were unclear, and before the money even moved, the process discouraged them.
Sei @SeiNetwork's Grid concept is very straightforward: gather and connect the key roles needed by institutions all at once—
USDC/USDT/PYUSD responsible for "how the money comes in," Revolut responsible for "traditional entry," Ondo/Securitize/KAIO (@KAIO_xyz) responsible for "how RWA is on-chain," CoinList responsible for "compliance and distribution," LayerZero/Wormhole/deBridge responsible for "how assets move across chains."
It's about connecting "deposit - buy assets - cross-chain - distribution" into a runnable pipeline. This kind of quiet but well-laid path is often the one that leads to big money later.