Did you know? In this crypto market, many new public chains are playing a game—throwing money to achieve faster speeds. The Move ecosystem is running at a lightning pace, and the Solana virtual machine's concurrency data is impressive, but it seems these folks have forgotten one thing: what’s the use of speed if no one is using it?



Kite Protocol's approach is actually quite interesting. Instead of following the trend to develop new virtual machines, they stubbornly stick to EVM. Some people don’t understand this and think it’s holding them back—why not just use the most advanced technology and abandon this somewhat "old-fashioned" compatibility scheme?

But this is actually the most ruthless move. Looking at the current situation in 2025, it’s clear: although various new public chain technologies are skyrocketing, what about liquidity? The data is right there—the entire network has over 85% of institutional-grade RWA (Real-World Assets) still concentrated on Ethereum, within the main developer resource pools, with over 70% still in the EVM ecosystem. That’s the reality.

Kite’s choice to stick with EVM is not due to a lack of innovation; rather, it’s a deep insight into the most authentic market truth. Developers, capital, projects—they are all driven by an invisible force, inseparable from the existing ecosystem. Instead of wasting effort building a new world, it’s smarter to operate within the current stronghold—only then can scattered resources be pulled together. That’s the real dimensionality reduction attack.
SOL-1.53%
ETH-0.25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
wrekt_but_learningvip
· 5h ago
To be honest, I fully understand this logic. Speed is useless without an ecosystem; it's just an empty shell. Kite's move is indeed ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirstvip
· 5h ago
Wow, this is really smart. Instead of following the trend and playing with virtual machines, sticking to EVM is the real win? 85% of RWA is still on Ethereum, how did I not think of that... Kite's move is indeed ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCuratorvip
· 5h ago
Haha, as expected, you still have to play the ecosystem, but the speed is a joke...
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercodervip
· 5h ago
Honestly, I’ve fully understood this logic. The new public chain keeps hyping up speed every day, but the liquidity is still stuck on Ethereum. It’s hilarious. Kite’s move is indeed sneaky; instead of hard confrontation, it leverages the situation. Quite interesting. Why is the EVM old relic so sticky? It’s all about the rich ecosystem, understand the developer costs involved. Wait, what are those institutions investing in Move and Solana thinking? Haven’t they seen this curve coming? Sticking to EVM = guaranteed win? Not necessarily, it still depends on execution.
View OriginalReply0
MevTearsvip
· 5h ago
Oh, you're right. Speed is overrated; without liquidity, it's just a ghost town. Got it now. EVM, this old relic, is actually a moat. Kite's move this time was smart—leveraging the trend without creating hype. 85% of RWA is in Ethereum; this data says everything. Instead of developing new virtual machines, it's better to be an EVM predator. Ecosystem stickiness is the key; capital flow is the most practical. New public chains burn money chasing speed, but it's all futile. Those who stick to EVM are the ones truly reaping the benefits. Liquidity is king; everything else is虚假, Kite sees through it.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDreamvip
· 5h ago
Wow, this is the true entrepreneurial mindset. Not following the trend actually makes you even more profitable.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)