2025-12-24 13:25:20

I recently came across a token project with a very interesting mechanism design. The core logic is to establish a bidirectional deflationary flywheel: each sale triggers a 3% automatic burn mechanism, while buying activates BNB buybacks. The tokens bought back are immediately sent to a black hole for permanent locking.

Simply put, it’s a process of trading, burning, and buyback happening automatically. As the number of transactions increases, the circulating token supply continuously decreases, while the liquidity pool actually expands—this is the so-called deflationary spiral. The pool becomes deeper, tokens become scarcer, and price support becomes stronger. The mechanism itself has promising potential, which is why many people are discussing it in the community.

BNB-0.48%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FOMOrektGuy

· 3h ago

It sounds like just another coin-burning buyback scheme. I've seen this mechanism too many times, and they all end up running away in the same way.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainUndercover

· 3h ago

It looks like the same old deflation scheme again, just a different trick --- 3% burn + black hole locking, sounds great but how long can it really last? --- The pool is deep, but the key is still whether someone will take the bait --- The automatic buyback scheme has been played out long ago, wake up everyone --- The term "imagination space" is the most dangerous; places where this term appears are often where people get cut --- Why does it seem like every new project can come up with a deflation logic? How many are truly stable? --- The flywheel is a flywheel, but beware of it crashing mid-flight --- Expanding liquidity pools ≠ price increase, these are two different things --- Good-looking mechanism, but the key is who is implementing it and what interests are behind it --- Another project that looks perfect mathematically but faces reality? I'll wait and see what happens next --- I've seen five or six projects like this, and the ending is usually the same

View OriginalReply0

RamenStacker

· 3h ago

Sounds good, but I still have some doubts. Hasn't this mechanism been played out before? --- Bidirectional deflation sounds nice, but what if the actual trading volume isn't enough? --- Automated destruction sounds great, but I'm worried about liquidity drying up later on. --- I've seen this kind of flywheel model many times; the key still depends on who's pumping the price. --- Black hole token locking? Feels like that's not a new concept... --- Strong price support? It’s strong when pumping, but just as likely to collapse when dumping. --- Buyback mechanisms are good, but you have to ask where the money is coming from. --- Another deflationary spiral... this kind of rhetoric is the same as last year's coins. --- It's somewhat creative, but this type of mechanism is too vulnerable to attack. --- Expanding liquidity pools? What I care about is the risk of rugpull.

View OriginalReply0

LazyDevMiner

· 3h ago

Oh no, it's that deflationary flywheel again. It sounds great, but how many actually work in practice? A beautiful mechanism doesn't guarantee survival; the key is whether there are real use cases. Burn 3%, buyback, lock... it all sounds perfect, but what if liquidity dries up? I've seen many projects like this. They can attract attention early on, but I'm worried that one day the black hole will turn into a black hand. Wait, where does the money for BNB buybacks come from? Taxes? Or... there's another trick? A great mechanism is just that—great. The real question is who is running it. Having genuine demand is the true key. High community discussion volume isn't necessarily a good thing; it often makes it easier for bagholders to gather. This kind of automated deflation sounds like playing hot potato; eventually, the music will stop.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 3h ago

Wait, how is the 3% burn rate in the white paper calculated? Based on data performance, the assumption of this deflationary model relies on continuous growth in trading volume, but what if trading declines? Referring to Vitalik's discussion on incentive mechanisms, this one-way game is fundamentally unsustainable. Moreover, locking tokens in a black hole does not equate to true burning. It's worth noting the contract permission settings—who can extract? Has this been shown in governance proposals?

View OriginalReply0

degenwhisperer

· 3h ago

Sounds good, the combination of automatic burn and buyback—this move is indeed quite fancy. The so-called deflationary spiral sounds nice, but can it really last... It seems the key still depends on whether trading volume can stay steady. The pool is deep, but I'm just worried that no one will step in to buy when the time comes, brother.

View OriginalReply0