2025-12-24 13:28:14

Some time ago, I discovered an interesting phenomenon in the prediction market: a trader has accumulated $100,000 in profits through accurate predictions, demonstrating an outstanding win rate. This piqued my curiosity.

I decided to use AI for an in-depth analysis of their trading logic. By carefully designing prompts, I had ChatGPT systematically analyze this trader's decision-making characteristics, timing of bets, risk management, and other dimensions, ultimately summarizing a replicable strategy framework.

The results exceeded expectations—this AI-refined methodology performed extremely stably in actual operations. This experience made me realize that the essence of prediction markets is information advantage and decision-making efficiency. Combining human observation skills with AI's data processing capabilities might break through the ceiling of traditional trading. Is anyone else using similar methods to study prediction markets?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenWhisperer

· 3h ago

Bro, I feel like this trick is a bit suspicious. Can the AI analysis logic be directly applied? --- $100,000 sounds great, but what about backtest data? It needs to be benchmarked. --- Wait, are you saying that just by prompt engineering, we can decode trading secrets? What kind of divine prompt is that? --- Predicting the market still relies on information asymmetry; AI is just a tool for quick processing. --- The question is, is that guy's $100,000 from historical data or real-time results? I'm a bit worried this might be survivor bias. --- I've tried similar ideas too, but honestly, once the market changes, AI analysis becomes invalid. It's not that simple. --- So the core is how you craft your prompts. Share some details, please. --- Sounds good, but it just seems like a new way to hype concepts. AI stock trading is an old trick. --- Combining human intuition with machines isn't a new idea, but execution is indeed the key. --- Why do people always believe there's a "reproducible" winning formula? That's too naive.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 3h ago

Haha, this idea is brilliant, essentially using AI as an X-ray scanner for traders. I'm a bit skeptical that this framework can be replicated; isn't the market like this—effective yesterday, but ineffective today? I've also tried similar approaches, but honestly, I still need to rely on my own market intuition.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeJumper

· 3h ago

Haha, isn't this the modern version of "learning from others"? Using AI as an intermediary, haha. Using prompts for reverse engineering others' trading logic—this idea is brilliant, gotta admit. But I still have some doubts. Is a sample size of $100,000 enough? Could it just happen to hit the right timing of a certain cycle? AI processes data quickly, but predicting the market still seems to rely on intuition and timing. Pure logical frameworks are easily proven wrong. Is it possible that ultimately, luck plays the biggest role in making money...

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 3h ago

To be honest, a $100,000 win rate that stable depends on the sample size; otherwise, it's easy to suffer big losses. Copying someone else's strategy sounds great, but if market sentiment shifts, you'll get wiped out. The problem is, AI can see the same information everyone else can see, so where is the true edge? Prompt engineering is reliable, but I'm worried it might fall into the survivor bias trap. I'm a bit interested, but I want to know if this method can survive in a bear market.

View OriginalReply0