2025-12-24 13:28:45

The FUD cycle is back. Every few months, you'll see the same pattern—"Solana is finished" trending again. Different messengers, identical script.

But here's what gets lost in the noise: Solana isn't just another cryptocurrency token. It's infrastructure—a blockchain settlement layer designed for speed and efficiency. The numbers speak for themselves. Fast finality, minimal transaction costs, actual on-chain activity, real throughput capacity, and genuine market demand driving adoption.

Market sentiment swings like a pendulum. Projects with solid fundamentals survive these cycles. The question isn't whether Solana survives the current wave of doubt—it's whether investors can distinguish between market mood and actual ecosystem health. One is temporary. The other determines long-term viability.

SOL-1.24%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenWhisperer

· 7h ago

Here we go again, it's the same old story every time... but to be honest, the fundamentals are there, and FUD will pass once it's over.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e87b21ee

· 7h ago

NGL, this FUD script really needs to be changed. It's always the same recycled hype... Solana's TPS is right there, if it was really going to fail, it would have already.

View OriginalReply0

CantAffordPancake

· 7h ago

I'm done, here we go again—the script where Solana is doomed. Wake up, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 7h ago

The Sol Life and Death Game is back again, always the same lines every time, really enough. But to be honest, the data is there, and in terms of TPS and gas fees, there are indeed differences, unlike those worthless tokens.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 7h ago

Here we go again, every time it's "Solana is done," and the script hasn't changed... The key still depends on the governance mechanism. The reliability of the infrastructure layer ultimately relies on mechanism design, not just hype about data. Periodic emotional crashes are nothing new; many projects have gone through this in history. What truly differentiates them is whether there is a coherent incentive-compatible mechanism. Those who can distinguish signals from noise in this round of FUD are the ones who truly understand the infrastructure.

View OriginalReply0