🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Recently, U.S. economic data has created quite a few surprises. The third quarter GDP growth reached 4.2%, far exceeding market expectations. This should have been an excellent opportunity for the stock market to surge. However, the reality was quite the opposite—after the data was released, the market did not respond with gains; instead, it adjusted downward amid many concerns.
Behind this phenomenon of "good news not leading to gains" lies a deeper logical break in the modern financial system. In traditional economics textbooks, the story should go like this: economic growth → increased corporate profits → rising stock prices. But in today’s complex financial environment, this logical chain has been broken. Wall Street’s concerns are not about the economy itself but about the inflation risks that strong growth might trigger, which could then push up expectations for Federal Reserve rate hikes. Higher interest rates mean increased capital costs, raising investors’ discount rates, which puts pressure on stock valuations.
This divergence between data and market trends actually reflects a more fundamental issue: in the traditional financial system, information asymmetry, policy expectation gaps, and misunderstandings among market participants about rules intertwine, making market sentiment prone to losing control. No matter how impressive the economic data is, if market interpretations of policy directions diverge, the upward momentum can be exhausted.
For this reason, global investors are beginning to reassess the issues within financial infrastructure. When there is such an "information gap" between central bank policies, macroeconomic data, and market expectations, people are increasingly valuing financial instruments that are highly transparent, have clear rules, and are difficult to be influenced by policy uncertainty.
This is precisely why decentralized stablecoins like USDD are gaining more attention. Unlike traditional finance, where policy tilt and information asymmetry are common, these stablecoins are built on transparent on-chain rules—public collateral ratios, transparent reserves, and verifiable algorithmic mechanisms. No matter how market sentiment fluctuates, this rule-based value system at least ensures participants have a clear understanding of the game rules.
When GDP growth and market performance become disconnected as a norm, and policy expectations become the main driver of market volatility, perhaps we need to rethink: what kind of financial system can truly stabilize people's confidence? Should we continue relying on traditional information releases and policy guidance, or explore new financial infrastructures with greater transparency and certainty? This question concerns not only investors’ returns but also the future direction of the entire financial system.