2025-12-24 17:20:40

In the past, the entire market was still small, on-chain execution was not so fast, and DeFi's "hypothesis culture" barely managed to survive. Price feedback was "frequent enough," liquidation logic "mostly effective," and oracles generally performed well—these seemingly sufficient standards got us through those days.

But times have changed.

It's different now. As automation deepens and capital density skyrockets, those once harmless assumptions are quietly turning into systemic risks. In other words, any decision you make could become a trigger for a chain reaction.

Apro was born based on this understanding. In a fully automated system, every interaction is final. No room for maneuver, no space for manual adjustments. Once executed, it means a commitment. This is the infrastructure that DeFi truly needs.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Deconstructionist

· 2h ago

That's very realistic. The era of "close enough is fine" is truly gone for good. --- When automation malfunctions, who takes the blame? --- Finally, someone hit the nail on the head. The term "systemic risk" is now being taken seriously. --- Sounds great to have no room for maneuver, but it also means that a single mistake could lead to total failure. The pressure is a bit intense. --- "Oracles are usually reliable, so trust them" haha. This is the true picture of DeFi, no doubt. --- Apro's approach is good, but can the implementation keep up? That's the key. --- The spark that triggers a chain reaction—what a metaphor. Automation itself is a double-edged sword. --- The surge in capital density really hit home. The problem is indeed intensifying; it must be addressed.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoComedian

· 2h ago

Laughing and then crying, from "Mr. Almost" to "systemic risk," DeFi has learned to self-reflect.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 3h ago

To be honest, that set of standards definitely needs to be phased out. There have been so many collapses, yet some still haven't learned their lesson. How many people still trust oracles now? Apro, I really respect this approach. Fully automated execution is indeed correct. But the real key is whether the risk control can be properly implemented. By the way, who will be responsible for the liquidation logic?

View OriginalReply0