Some time ago, a big holder exchanged BTC for a certain stablecoin to invest, with an annualized return of 20% looking pretty good. But here’s the problem—the liquidity pool of this stablecoin is too small, and large transactions directly caused the price to spike, even soaring to $24,000 per coin. What was the result? No matter how high the investment returns are, they can't cover this loss; years of profit would be wasted.



But from another perspective, this situation actually exposes an arbitrage opportunity. When a certain stablecoin shows a premium, you can exchange USDT at a low price, then invest in high-yield financial products. After the coin price corrects, you can convert back. Such an operation space indeed exists. The key is to seize the right timing—not all premiums are worth participating in. You need to wait until the price is artificially high but not ridiculous before jumping in; otherwise, you'll just become the bagholder.
BTC0.47%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NftMetaversePaintervip
· 3h ago
ngl this is peak defi theater—watching someone get liquidated on their own "safe play" never gets old. the real alpha was always in the arbitrage gap, not the yield farming fantasy.
Reply0
TokenAlchemistvip
· 3h ago
ngl this liquidity crunch is basically a textbook slippage disaster waiting to happen. the real alpha here isn't the 20% yield—it's recognizing when the peg breaks and the arbitrage surface actually becomes exploitable. timing matters fr, most people just fomo into the premium and get rekt.
Reply0
BridgeNomadvip
· 3h ago
tbh this screams liquidity fragmentation nightmare—seen this exact playbook with the poly network exploit, except the exit was way messier. 20% apy on a stablecoin with paper-thin tvl is literally just visual copium, the slippage on that trade probably ate half the gains anyway. not touching that without running the numbers on optimal routing first, ngl the counter-party risk alone makes me itch.
Reply0
BoredApeResistancevip
· 3h ago
20% annualized? Ha, it's the same old story... Once liquidity collapses, everything's ruined.
View OriginalReply0
HackerWhoCaresvip
· 3h ago
Wow, this big investor really dares to do it. A 20% return is worth the brain.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStrikervip
· 3h ago
This big spender is really a bit greedy; a 20% return must have fried their brain. The liquidity pool is so small and they still dare to go all-in. Serves them right.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)