2025-12-26 12:42:14

Recently, Trust Wallet was hacked, and user assets lost nearly $7 million. After the incident was exposed, major leading exchanges all stated that they would compensate affected users. From this, you can see a mature platform's attitude towards user assets — it's not about shifting blame, but about genuine responsibility.

This incident actually hit many people's pain points. Whether in a bull or bear market, the security of funds can never be relaxed. That’s why when choosing a wallet or DeFi project, security must be the top priority. Don’t be fooled by high yields; first ask yourself: Has this product undergone security audits? Is the team reliable? Have there been any issues in the past?

To put it simply, everyone who has suffered losses in this field understands one truth — no matter how good the returns are, they only count if they can be safely put into your pocket. Instead of regretting afterward, it’s better to do your homework thoroughly upfront.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShitcoinArbitrageur

· 2025-12-28 16:03

7 million lost, will the exchange still compensate? This is the real deal --- Another security audit, another team background check, sounds good but I still can't trust it --- Really, high returns are just illusions; getting your money back is the real goal --- Trust Wallet has made such a big move, it seems no one can guarantee 100% safety --- I just want to know how those 7 million users are doing now. Can they really get full compensation? --- Instead of dreaming about tenfold returns every day, it's better to protect your money first. A painful lesson --- What does it mean when top exchanges dare to compensate? It shows small platforms simply can't afford to --- Now I have to review my wallet again. So annoying --- Safety first, I've heard it countless times, but people still fall for it. Human weakness --- Here's the question: when choosing a wallet, do you really check for security audits? I haven't checked at all --- Getting it into your pocket is what counts. I agree, but how to tell if it's reliable or not is really hard --- Wow, this time I really learned a lesson. It was a bit costly

View OriginalReply0

PumpBeforeRug

· 2025-12-28 09:01

$7 million is gone just like that. It's impressive that the exchange dares to compensate, but I just want to ask, what's going on with Trust Wallet? Getting exploited this much and still relying on big platforms to save you—how disgusting is that? I’ve fallen into traps before, and now I only follow one rule—high returns are all scams. Be careful, your wallet might be gone. Security audits, team background checks—these are really essential. Otherwise, you deserve to be exploited.

View OriginalReply0

ClassicDumpster

· 2025-12-26 13:12

$7,000,000 just disappeared like that, you still need to be more cautious Not all wallets are reliable; you should choose those that truly have responsibility No matter how great the high returns are, always ask if a security audit has been done Once you've been burned, you'll know that safety always comes first Exchanges that dare to compensate are trustworthy; everything else is nonsense This time, Trust Wallet's failure serves as a warning to everyone No matter how glamorous the promises, nothing beats a proven safety record

View OriginalReply0

TheShibaWhisperer

· 2025-12-26 13:10

$7 million just gone like that, it's really incredible. If you ask me, you still need to keep your eyes open and not just focus on the APY.

View OriginalReply0

TokenStorm

· 2025-12-26 13:09

On-chain data shows that after this incident, security audit concept stocks surged, but I still choose to continue going all-in on high-yield projects that haven't been audited yet, which aligns with my expectations for myself.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 2025-12-26 13:07

The figure of 7 million USD... Actual data shows us how terrifying the attack vectors on cold wallets can be. The Trust Wallet incident made me reevaluate the security vulnerabilities in protocol architecture. --- It has been proven that no matter how fancy the cross-chain ecosystem is, it cannot compensate for fundamental security flaws. We need to carefully review the audit reports and not just focus on APY. --- This incident is quite desperate. Although major exchanges have shown a good attitude towards compensation, it feels like this is already the bottom line... What we should reflect on is our asset migration strategy. --- Compensation is a later matter; I am more interested in how that 7 million was specifically leaked. Which attack vector was breached? We must understand these details before continuing to use the wallet. --- So my current logic is: first run multi-chain testing feedback, then decide which chain to move the funds to. I don't want to suffer losses again. --- What seems like a routine security incident is actually a reveal of interoperability design flaws... I need to immediately check my bridging mechanism configuration.

View OriginalReply0

Deconstructionist

· 2025-12-26 12:54

$7 million is gone just like that, but luckily the exchange compensates. But to be honest, most small projects tend to pass the buck when they run away, that's the difference.

View OriginalReply0

ForkThisDAO

· 2025-12-26 12:42

$7,000,000 is this? I've already migrated to a cold wallet. --- Leading exchanges daring to compensate are the real winners; trash small platforms that run away are faster to disappear than to pay. --- It sounds good, but it's still more reassuring to hold your private keys yourself. --- Security audits are really necessary; don't be blinded by APY. --- Another hack and compensation, it's a thankless effort. Self-custody is more reliable. --- Trust Wallet? I only trust my own self-custody wallet. --- After losing once, I understand. No matter how high the returns are, they're not worth it.

View OriginalReply0