A college track athlete's career hit a wall over $6K—and it says something about how institutions tighten control over financial flows. Mohammed Bati, a standout runner at Minnesota, got banned after accepting a donation meant for tuition. The rulebook doesn't bend for necessity. This kind of regulatory overreach mirrors broader patterns: when established systems feel threatened by financial autonomy, they clamp down. Whether it's NCAA rules or compliance frameworks, the message stays the same—move money the "approved" way, or face consequences.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DegenApeSurfervip
· 1h ago
ngl, this is outrageous. Just 6k dollars can ruin an athlete's future... The NCAA rules are really just playing a power game.
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larryvip
· 8h ago
nah this is actually wild... ncaa really said "starving? too bad" lol
Reply0
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 8h ago
Nah, this is wild for real. Does NCAA really treat students like that? Can 6k ruin an athlete's future?
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 8h ago
NGL, this is ridiculous. You can get banned even with 6k? The rules are just there to mess with people.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketmanvip
· 9h ago
This is a typical case of the trajectory being locked, and the rule system sensing a threat and starting to reduce thrust... The NCAA framework should have entered supersonic cruise a long time ago, but it's still on the ground checking fuel formulas.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)