Many people enter the crypto space with the idea of getting rich overnight, but within a few months, they lose everything. I've seen it too many times—holding just a thousand or so dollars, jumping into the market and going all-in, hoping a single trend will change their life. And what happens? The market eats their money before they even react.



Last year, a newcomer and I traded together, starting with $800, and in five months, it grew to nearly $30,000. The key point is that we never had a margin call during the entire process. This is not luck, but because we followed a few strict rules from the very beginning.

**Rule 1: Divide your funds into three parts, never go all-in**

How to allocate that $800? Divide it into three equal parts, each with its own purpose.

The first part, $300, is dedicated to intraday short-term trading. I only focus on BTC and ETH; I don't even look at other coins. The goal is clear—capture small fluctuations of 3 to 5 points and exit. For example, if BTC enters at 120,000 and rises to 124,000, I exit immediately, earning just over 3 points, and don’t be greedy. Opportunities like this happen every week. As long as you execute consistently, the success rate is high.

The second part, $300, is for swing trading. This requires patience. Don’t act without clear signals—what are signals? Major events like Federal Reserve rate decisions or spot ETF approvals. Wait for these catalysts before taking action, entering the market for three to five days, then exiting. Last November, during the ETF wave, this $300 was invested for five days and safely earned $80—this is the result of this approach.

The third part, $200, is reserved as a risk buffer. When the market is bad or judgment is off, it provides a cushion so you’re not wiped out by sudden changes.

The beauty of this allocation method is that even with small capital, you can generate compound effects while keeping drawdowns within manageable limits. Many people fail because they don’t grasp this balance.
BTC0.06%
ETH-0.04%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 4h ago
Dividing into three parts is an old trick; the key is to stick to discipline. Most people can't do it. Bro, this theory sounds really solid, but why do so many people still lose money even when they follow it? I think the problem isn't about allocation; it's about human nature. 800U over five months turning into 30,000. Honestly, it sounds suspicious. It's not that I don't believe you, but it's a matter of probability. All-in is indeed stupid, but dividing into three parts doesn't necessarily guarantee profit either. You still need to be good at choosing coins and reading signals. Short-term gains of three to five points sound easy, but in actual operation, your fingers will tremble. This really tests your mentality. I agree with this idea, but the premise is that you can actually execute it. Most people break within the first week. I like the risk cushion part; at least those who take drawdowns seriously are already halfway to winning. Good data looks good, but the question is whether you've considered the role of luck when reviewing the results...
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuildervip
· 4h ago
The three-way split sounds good, but how many people can actually execute it... The all-in approach has been seen too many times, and every time they say this time is different. That's very true, but the problem is most people simply don't have the mindset to control it. I've tried the idea of splitting into three parts, and it's the most challenging test of human nature in execution. Here we go again, these backtest data all look perfect. Honestly, those who can stick to this discipline are already halfway to winning. Avoiding liquidation is the most critical point, more important than how much you earn. From 800U to 30,000 in five months? Any institution would be envious of this data. It's easy to say but hard to do; who can resist the urge to add to their position when their hands are itching?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 4h ago
Three fund allocation plans sound good, but I'm worried that newcomers might not be able to stick with them at all. This logic is actually about mindset management; execution is the biggest hurdle. Going from 800U to 30,000U sounds easy to say, but how many times did you have to resist the temptation to go all-in? I'm more curious about the swing trading part—can you really always accurately identify catalysts? Three to five points intraday sounds stable, but can you handle the transaction fees? Honestly, most people just lack a good mindset, not knowledge.
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 4h ago
It sounds like a system, but how many can truly stick to this discipline?
View OriginalReply0
MechanicalMartelvip
· 4h ago
Alright, I agree with these three position allocations. I'm just worried that newcomers will still can't resist going all-in after reading them.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)