Bridging Bitcoin across chains remains a pain point for most users. Current market solutions typically impose 1% fees or higher on cross-chain transfers, which stacks up quickly on large transactions. Some newer protocols are pushing efficiency boundaries—offering rates around 0.1%, cutting costs dramatically for sizable moves. For users transferring substantial amounts, this kind of pricing gap can translate to savings reaching 10 times lower fees compared to traditional solutions. It's worth monitoring how competition in the bridge space continues to reshape fee structures and user economics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_therapist
· 01-06 19:50
The cross-chain fee is so outrageous, no wonder big players are waiting for the new protocol.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 01-06 19:47
0.1% fee rate? Really? Is it that competitive?
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreather
· 01-06 19:43
Cross-chain fees are really outrageous. Before the 0.1% protocol appeared, I was almost being drained.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgain
· 01-06 19:42
0.1% fee rate? Sounds good, finally someone has figured out cross-chain stuff.
Bridging Bitcoin across chains remains a pain point for most users. Current market solutions typically impose 1% fees or higher on cross-chain transfers, which stacks up quickly on large transactions. Some newer protocols are pushing efficiency boundaries—offering rates around 0.1%, cutting costs dramatically for sizable moves. For users transferring substantial amounts, this kind of pricing gap can translate to savings reaching 10 times lower fees compared to traditional solutions. It's worth monitoring how competition in the bridge space continues to reshape fee structures and user economics.