Recently, there's an interesting arbitrage opportunity worth paying attention to—by combining liquidity tokens generated through staking with low-interest borrowing, you can really achieve good returns.



Let's start with the core logic. When you stake BNB, you'll receive interest-bearing assets like slisBNB, which not only retain staking rewards but also provide liquidity that can be used for collateralization. The clever part here is that the borrowing rate for stablecoins like USD1 is only around 0.4-1.2%, which is a rare low-cost rate across the entire network.

How does the operation work specifically? You can collateralize 50% of the value in BTCB or other assets, borrow USD1, and then use this borrowed amount to participate in high-yield products on leading platforms (there have been cases with around 20% APY). This way, the net yield can reach over 19%. Alternatively, for more advanced strategies, using interest-bearing assets like PT-USDe as collateral can enable multi-layered yield stacking—a single asset generating multiple streams of income.

However, there are several important points to note. First, the LTV (Loan-to-Value ratio) must be kept below 50% to provide buffer during market volatility. Second, keep an eye on the spread changes; this arbitrage opportunity is essentially a temporary market inefficiency, and as more people exploit it, it will be corrected. Lastly, avoid betting on a single channel; diversifying risk is crucial.

Honestly, such opportunities arise because of pricing discrepancies between different protocols, and some ecosystems can sustain this low-cost borrowing environment. But there’s no free lunch—higher yields come with higher risks, so careful risk assessment is essential. If you want to participate, start with small amounts to test the waters, understand the risks at each step, and then leverage gradually.
BNB0,82%
USD10,01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektButAlivevip
· 4h ago
Sounds good, but I still chickened out. The 0.4% lending rate is so tempting that it actually makes me cautious. A bunch of protocols are mutually entangled, and once the interest rate gap is filled, the game is over. Who will be the ones to take the hit then? Does the 20% APY product still exist? It seems that risk and reward have always gone hand in hand. Trying a small amount sounds wise, but honestly, I usually just pass on these opportunities. It's not that I want to appear conservative; experience tells me that things that seem too good to be true often have pitfalls. Stacking staking rewards with lending yields and then adding product returns, after several layers of nesting, I really can't imagine how low the risk of a collapse could be. A 50% LTV sounds safe, but when the market crashes really hard, do you think the liquidation line will wait for you to react?
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamotovip
· 01-08 16:54
Looks good, but how long can this spread last? Once arbitrageurs fill it up, it will be over.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Banditvip
· 01-07 10:41
nah, seen this play before during the 2021 cycle. the ltv controls are real tho, can't be greedy here.
Reply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 01-07 10:40
Oh, 19% net profit sounds great, but I've seen this trick too many times; the risk is hidden very deep. Is low interest genuine? Let's verify first. Many people can't hold onto an LTV of 50%, don't get liquidated and cry too late. Interest rate spreads are really just a flash in the pan; when more people join, it disappears in seconds. I just want to ask, what if there's a problem with USD1, who bears the ecosystem risk? Stability or small-scale testing is more reliable; don't go all in right away. The layered yield sounds great, but in practice, many end up stepping into traps. It feels like betting that the market pricing is wrong, which is inherently high-risk gameplay. Diversifying risk sounds simple, but few can truly do it. A 0.4% lending rate is so low; think about why it's so cheap?
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapistvip
· 01-07 10:38
19% returns sound tempting, but how long can this arbitrage window last? Once more people start using it, it will be filled up quickly.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSellervip
· 01-07 10:34
Sounds good, but this low interest margin won't last long. Once more people use it, it will be knocked flat immediately.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeakervip
· 01-07 10:23
Honestly, this strategy is indeed interesting, but I always feel that a 0.4% lending rate won't last long. I'm just worried that as more people join, the risks will also increase, and the arbitrage space will disappear in a second. This 19% return looks tempting, but in actual operation, you still need to be cautious, or else losing money could happen in 0.19 seconds. 19% is too tempting; I'm just afraid it's a mirage. It feels like this thing could be fixed at any time, and those who buy the dip end up becoming bagholders. A 50% LTV is definitely the bottom line, but how many people can really stick to it during actual operation? Damn, another seemingly perfect arbitrage with hidden pitfalls everywhere—better to test with small amounts first. It looks simple but actually has so many risk points that it's explosive; I choose to wait and see. The higher the return, the more fragile the code. This kind of multi-chain arbitrage will eventually crash sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)