In the war of blockchain scalability, Layer 2 solves the expensive problem of Ethereum, but for high-frequency interactive games, Layer 2 is still too costly and congested. As someone who works in IT architecture, I am very aware of the importance of "resource isolation." XAI's Layer 3 architecture (Orbit Chain) is essentially a resource isolation strategy. It no longer allows game transactions to compete with DeFi whale trades for block space but instead opens up a dedicated high-speed lane. This is like configuring "bare-metal servers" for core business in cloud computing rather than "shared cloud hosts." This fundamental architectural difference determines that only on XAI can heavy blockchain games with a daily active user base of millions and thousands of interactions per second truly run smoothly. This is not a multiple-choice question; it is a must-answer question dictated by physical performance.



{spot}(XAIUSDT)
ETH0,53%
XAI-1,16%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)