In various DeFi platforms and community tutorials, you can always see people showcasing exaggerated profit screenshots: "By using 5x recursive lending, pushing BNB staking yields above 50%!" Such numbers seem incredible in the real world where bank interest rates are only 3%. Many are attracted by these figures and mechanically follow the "stake - borrow - buy - restake" cycle, naively believing they can create wealth out of thin air.
But behind this seemingly perfect formula lies a trap that can instantly wipe out your principal. The essence of recursive lending is to exponentially amplify your risk exposure. When you enable 3x leverage, a 10% drop in BNB price means your net assets shrink by 30%. The mathematical relationship is brutal—the leverage multiple and the loss percentage are directly multiplied.
Even worse is the liquidation mechanism. Once the price hits the liquidation threshold, the system forcibly auctions your collateral and charges high penalties. During market crashes, on-chain congestion often spikes, gas fees skyrocket, and attempting to manually unwind the cycle or repay debt is usually too late—transactions get stuck in Pending status until the liquidation notice is issued. By then, it’s too late to turn back.
My personal use of recursive lending is limited to a scenario: the market is in a low-volatility sideways consolidation, and I monitor real-time charts or have set up alerts. Most importantly, I never get greedy to the extreme. If the protocol allows a 70% LTV, I only use up to 40%. Taking the risk of principal liquidation just to earn that extra 10% annualized yield is the worst risk-reward choice among all gambling strategies.
In this tempting market, knowing when to stop is often more valuable than knowing how to operate.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LidoStakeAddict
· 12h ago
It's the same old trick again, 50% annualized? I just smile, and as soon as the Gas fee skyrockets, liquidation notices start coming...
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 01-10 11:50
Damn it, I just saw another "50% annualized" snake oil... Really, every time I see these screenshots, I think of the guy who got liquidated last time. That day, he was still showing off with 3x leverage, and the next day he was wiped out. This stuff is just high-interest lending in disguise, under the guise of DeFi, but in reality, it's just gambling on whether you can run faster than the liquidation... Can you? No. When the Gas gets clogged, you're done.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 01-10 11:50
Buddy, I've fallen into this trap before. 50% annualized? Haha, on the day of liquidation, the gas fees took half my life. 5x leverage is a double-edged sword; a sneeze in the market and you're gone. Basically, it's gambler's mentality—you have to push the LTV to the limit to be satisfied. Now I only dare to use up to 40%, leaving the rest for the chance to survive. That's the real smart move to maximize gains. Knowing when not to operate is worth much more than watching the charts every day.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKing
· 01-10 11:44
50% annualized? Laughing out loud, a single waterfall drop and your principal is gone, still playing with heartbeats?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 01-10 11:43
Honestly, I just laughed when I saw this screenshot of a 50% annualized return. It was only at the moment of liquidation that I understood what "there's no turning back" means.
The surge in Gas fees causing Pending status is really incredible, it feels like watching your house burn down right in front of your eyes.
The key is that most people don't realize that leverage is a double-edged sword. A 10% drop directly shrinks your position by 30%. That math can really drive people crazy.
Taking profits is the way to go. Greed for that last 10% gain results in losing the principal, which is really not worth it.
I think loop loans should only be played during consolidation periods; otherwise, it's just gambling.
Using an LTV of 40% is already very aggressive. No wonder the author is still alive and kicking.
The liquidation mechanism is just a trap that eats people. Anyone who plays it will regret it.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOops
· 01-10 11:33
Seeing someone else wants to play with 5x leverage again, I really can't hold it anymore.
The promised 50% annualized return, but the coin just tanked and got liquidated, and I can't even afford the Gas fee. This is the real picture of Web3.
My only advice: monitor the market + limit LTV. If you're too lazy to think, don't touch revolving loans.
In various DeFi platforms and community tutorials, you can always see people showcasing exaggerated profit screenshots: "By using 5x recursive lending, pushing BNB staking yields above 50%!" Such numbers seem incredible in the real world where bank interest rates are only 3%. Many are attracted by these figures and mechanically follow the "stake - borrow - buy - restake" cycle, naively believing they can create wealth out of thin air.
But behind this seemingly perfect formula lies a trap that can instantly wipe out your principal. The essence of recursive lending is to exponentially amplify your risk exposure. When you enable 3x leverage, a 10% drop in BNB price means your net assets shrink by 30%. The mathematical relationship is brutal—the leverage multiple and the loss percentage are directly multiplied.
Even worse is the liquidation mechanism. Once the price hits the liquidation threshold, the system forcibly auctions your collateral and charges high penalties. During market crashes, on-chain congestion often spikes, gas fees skyrocket, and attempting to manually unwind the cycle or repay debt is usually too late—transactions get stuck in Pending status until the liquidation notice is issued. By then, it’s too late to turn back.
My personal use of recursive lending is limited to a scenario: the market is in a low-volatility sideways consolidation, and I monitor real-time charts or have set up alerts. Most importantly, I never get greedy to the extreme. If the protocol allows a 70% LTV, I only use up to 40%. Taking the risk of principal liquidation just to earn that extra 10% annualized yield is the worst risk-reward choice among all gambling strategies.
In this tempting market, knowing when to stop is often more valuable than knowing how to operate.