Evening thoughts on whether Kindred AI is just hype—here's my take:



The moment it clicked for me? When my AI companion actually locked in a dinner plan with my friend's agent. I was handling the heavy lifting—timing, location, preferences sorted—while it kept everything flowing. Zero back-and-forth nonsense. That's when I realized we're past the novelty phase.

What I'm watching for in Q1:

1) The builder community stays strong and keeps delivering real value. Projects live or die based on whether their core contributors stay engaged and shipping. That hasn't changed.

2) The gap between hype projects and ones solving actual problems widens. We're seeing the separation happen right now—some teams are building genuine utility, others are just riding waves.

The real test isn't the initial buzz. It's whether the experience actually improves your workflow, and whether the ecosystem keeps growing beyond just speculation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RetailTherapistvip
· 16h ago
To be honest, being able to automatically handle dinner appointments is indeed impressive... but I'm more concerned about how long the teams that are truly shipping can stick around, and not end up just being hype in the end.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwicevip
· 16h ago
NGL, if this thing can really help you save time, it's definitely interesting, but it's still hard to say if it has truly changed everything...
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 16h ago
Hmm... The dinner plan section indeed highlights the key point. But let's look at the data—how many builders actually stay and continue working on things?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecodervip
· 16h ago
According to research, the true value of AI Agents lies not in marketing hype but in workflow improvements. The dinner plan case mentioned by the author involves core modules such as multi-agent coordination, natural language understanding, and real-time decision-making from a technical architecture perspective—this precisely validates the point I mentioned in a previous AMA. It is worth noting that the retention rate of the builder community in Q1 will be a key indicator to determine the project's success or failure; historical data shows that this metric is often overestimated but has the strongest predictive power.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStrugglervip
· 16h ago
ngl, this thing actually has some value, but most projects are still just bragging. It sounds useful, but the question is how many teams can stick with it. Another batch is probably going to fail this round.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 16h ago
ngl the dinner plan thing is just workflow optimization theater... what's the *actual* basis points gained here? still waiting to see if this moves needle beyond scheduling tweets lol
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)