I am currently working on a survey project and encountered a tricky problem: how to enable information providers to submit sensitive files completely anonymously and securely, while also ensuring that these files cannot be accessed by others before a specified time?



Traditional encryption methods have a fatal flaw—they always require someone to hold the decryption key. If that person is compromised, everything is ruined. We decided to try a different approach.

Using Walrus's Seal privacy protocol, we built a "decentralized dead letter box" system. The process is as follows: when uploading information, the file is first encrypted on the client side. Then comes the critical step—splitting the decryption key into dozens of parts using Shamir's secret sharing technique, and dispersing these parts across various verification nodes in the Walrus network.

Next, we write a smart contract to set the decryption rules. For example, in our case, the rule is: either after January 1, 2030, or upon obtaining joint signatures from five well-known journalists—if either condition is met, the verification nodes will release the key fragments.

What’s the brilliance of this scheme? Walrus's inherent censorship resistance guarantees that the files will never be deleted. Meanwhile, Seal's threshold encryption mechanism ensures that the files cannot be decrypted until the conditions are fulfilled. Honestly, even as a developer, I can't access the files prematurely if the time hasn't come or the required signatures aren't collected.

This is an example of enforcing trust through mathematics and code. For environments where information transfer carries high risks, this system offers a quite reliable protection.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CrashHotlinevip
· 19h ago
This idea is brilliant, even the developers can't open it? That really means trust is written into the code. Shamir's secret sharing for distributed keys is indeed fierce, much more reliable than single-point encryption. Wait, a joint signature by 5 reporters... Is this providing ultimate insurance for whistleblowers? Mathematics enforces trust, sounds a bit romantic haha. A truly decentralized dead letter box—people who come up with this idea have no problem with their brains. 2030... This is leaving a bomb for the future. Once the contract rules are hardcoded, no one can change them. That's true "immutability." What if a hacker infiltrates a validation node? Still secure, right? Censorship resistance + time lock + multi-signature... a perfect trifecta, this setup is indeed foolproof. One person can't live long enough to see this, haha, a bit of dark humor.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGodvip
· 23h ago
Damn, this idea is really brilliant. Math-based trust is truly the ultimate solution. --- Shamir sharing + smart contracts, it feels like putting an invincible lock on sensitive information, even developers can't open it? --- It can only be opened in 2030 haha, how many leaks will need to queue up then? --- Decentralized dead letter boxes sound cool, but with such high complexity, will there really be many practical use cases? --- Finally, someone has integrated time locks and encryption so thoroughly. --- By the way, what if one of the 5 reporters is bribed? This mechanism might not hold up then. --- Code-based enforced trust > human promises. This is what Web3 should be doing. --- I just want to know if Walrus nodes can really withstand censorship pressure; being impressive on paper doesn't mean they'll perform well in practice.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.ethvip
· 01-10 15:50
This is the true decentralized mindset— even developers can't access it themselves. Incredible.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidatorvip
· 01-10 15:48
Unbelievable, even the developers can't open it themselves. This is what true "I can't save you either" looks like. Shamir sharing this move feels a hundred times more reliable than traditional single-key solutions. But then again, it won't open until 2030... how much patience does that require? This is what I mean—replacing trust with code, cryptography is faith. The concept of dead letters actually existed long ago, but using blockchain to play with it is indeed innovative. I'm a bit worried that reaching a consensus among five journalists might also be a challenge. If this set of tools is adopted by major news agencies, the public opinion landscape might change drastically.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDreamvip
· 01-10 15:33
Oh my, isn't this the legendary "Mathematical Iron Gate"? Even the developers can't open it, impressive. Shamir's trick is indeed brilliant, but I just want to ask one question... What if these 5 reporters all suffer from amnesia? This logic is a bit crazy, I like it. A completely decentralized dead letter box, really has that flavor. Calm down, Walrus really has such strong anti-censorship capabilities? Feels a bit exaggerated. It won't open until 2030? Friend, this isn't a safe, it's a time capsule haha. Code is law, this sentence beats a thousand advertising slogans, I vote for it. But on second thought, if the keys are distributed across nodes... what if the Walrus network encounters problems someday? This scheme is actually using mathematics to replace human nature, quite philosophical. After looking at so many security solutions, this one really has some real skills. Just a bit complicated, can ordinary users understand it? Feels like describing the next-generation "secret weapon," a bit fierce.
View OriginalReply0
FromMinerToFarmervip
· 01-10 15:33
Awesome, this is the true decentralized mindset Even the developers can't access it? That's a brilliant logic I need to study this Shamir secret sharing trick We'll see in 2030, that's pretty intense haha This is the significance of on-chain enforcement Finally, someone is using encryption correctly Distributing the keys indeed solves the single point of failure risk But what if those 5 journalists all go offline, it's still a bit risky Mathematics won't betray you, I agree with that statement
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 01-10 15:29
Wow, this system design is pretty impressive. Really, the Shamir sharing part I think is the key, no single point of failure—awesome. But it can't be opened until 2030? Feels like playing a time capsule game... Even developers can't open it, now that's true code as law. If used for reporting, it would be perfect. In high-risk environments, this is really urgently needed.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)