Cross-chain bridges have long been targeted by hackers, and the root cause is quite painful—target chains simply cannot verify the complete state of the source chain; they can only gamble on a multi-signature node team not to mess up. This security vulnerability is thus embedded.
The industry has considered using light clients to solve this problem. In principle, it's feasible, but the trouble lies in: you need to upload a bunch of block headers and Merkle proofs on-chain, and the gas fees for this can be extremely painful. The data volume is huge, and the costs are high, making this a long-standing challenge.
Now, there's an interesting new idea. Imagine packaging all block headers and proofs from Solana over a certain period into a data bundle stored in the Walrus storage protocol. Then? You only need to send the bundle's ID and a super-simplified aggregate signature to Sui. The verification contract on Sui can then verify the data by sampling from Walrus, confirming that Solana's state is indeed valid—without downloading all the data.
This design is very clever. Walrus becomes a "high-capacity cache" for cross-chain communication, cheap and verifiable. The cross-chain bridge upgrades from "trusting certain entities" to "trusting mathematical proofs," all without incurring astronomical fees due to massive data.
For developers working on interoperability infrastructure, this low-cost and verifiable data availability solution is essentially the missing piece for achieving trustless cross-chain communication.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeBarbecue
· 1h ago
Once again, a savior solution for the storage layer. I think this Walrus idea actually has some merit.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 15h ago
Wow, Walrus's caching trick is amazing. Finally, someone has cracked the big problem of Gas fees.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 15h ago
nah actually if you read the walrus whitepaper... the spot sampling mechanism has some gnarly edge cases nobody's talking about. classic premature market euphoria imo
Reply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 15h ago
Wow, finally someone has explained the Walrus system clearly. I used to not understand why storage protocols are used for cross-chain verification, and now I get it — it's just transferring the gas fees, clever.
But to be honest, whether this方案 can truly be implemented depends on the actual execution. After all, cross-chain has been a坑 for so many years, and every time they say it's going to be revolutionary.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinion
· 15h ago
Someone finally explained this clearly. Those previous cross-chain solutions were really just trust games, and we were gambling that multi-signature teams wouldn't cause trouble... Using Walrus as a cache now is truly brilliant; gas fees plummet while mathematical verification is possible. This is the right way.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 15h ago
Wow, someone finally explained this thoroughly. I always thought that multi-signature cross-chain was just a gamble on people's integrity.
Cross-chain bridges have long been targeted by hackers, and the root cause is quite painful—target chains simply cannot verify the complete state of the source chain; they can only gamble on a multi-signature node team not to mess up. This security vulnerability is thus embedded.
The industry has considered using light clients to solve this problem. In principle, it's feasible, but the trouble lies in: you need to upload a bunch of block headers and Merkle proofs on-chain, and the gas fees for this can be extremely painful. The data volume is huge, and the costs are high, making this a long-standing challenge.
Now, there's an interesting new idea. Imagine packaging all block headers and proofs from Solana over a certain period into a data bundle stored in the Walrus storage protocol. Then? You only need to send the bundle's ID and a super-simplified aggregate signature to Sui. The verification contract on Sui can then verify the data by sampling from Walrus, confirming that Solana's state is indeed valid—without downloading all the data.
This design is very clever. Walrus becomes a "high-capacity cache" for cross-chain communication, cheap and verifiable. The cross-chain bridge upgrades from "trusting certain entities" to "trusting mathematical proofs," all without incurring astronomical fees due to massive data.
For developers working on interoperability infrastructure, this low-cost and verifiable data availability solution is essentially the missing piece for achieving trustless cross-chain communication.