2026-01-10 17:31:35

Recently, I've noticed subtle changes in the role of AI assistants within the DeFi ecosystem. Previously, these AI chat tools were just auxiliary features; now they are beginning to serve as connectors—integrating wallets, liquidity, and cross-chain operations into one. Platforms like Elsa, through points systems and on-chain credential incentives, encourage user participation, and the integration of cross-chain tasks makes the entire ecosystem run more smoothly. From toy-level applications last year to now actual functional integrations, this evolution is worth observing. AI is becoming the glue of DeFi infrastructure.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasSavingMaster

· 13h ago

The connector positioning is interesting, but the real question is how smoothly cross-chain transfers can be. --- Elsa's points incentive mechanism looks pretty good, but I'm just worried it might be another scheme to cut leeks. --- From toys to infrastructure, this wave of evolution is indeed impressive, but it still depends on how the actual implementation turns out. --- I accept the idea of AI as an adhesive, provided that we don't see incidents like protocols running away again. --- Honestly, everyone doing DeFi layer-2 is just trying to ride the hype. If Elsa can stick around until next year, I’ll consider myself defeated. --- Cross-chain has always been a trap. Can AI solve the gas fee problem? --- This logic is a bit convoluted. Is AI integration for liquidity better than an aggregator? --- It's worth observing, but I still want to know when the operational barriers will truly be lowered.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiGreenie

· 13h ago

I understand the term "connector," but Elsa's points incentive system feels like the air coin schemes from last year... --- Using AI as an adhesive? It depends on whether it can truly lower the interaction barriers; otherwise, it's just adding a layer of complexity. --- Cross-chain integration definitely has potential, but I'm worried it might just become another pseudo-need. --- From toys to infrastructure, with this progress rate... when will I be able to actually use it? --- Honestly, I'm still a bit confused about DeFi+AI. Can someone explain in one sentence what it can actually do? --- Point system incentives—aren't they just a disguised form of mining? Still the same old approach. --- If you ask me, the key still depends on actual transaction volume and retention; otherwise, it's just pretty data. --- I've looked into Elsa; it still feels too early. Let's wait another six months and see.

View OriginalReply0

APY_Chaser

· 13h ago

I've seen this trick before. AI integration into DeFi is just hype; how many are truly practical? Elsa's points system is somewhat interesting, but don't overhype cross-chain operations. AI adhesive? Now every project claims to be infrastructure—it's just marketing hype. I've been hearing this kind of talk since last year and am still observing. It's basically just wrapping existing features in an AI shell; there's no real fundamental change in user experience.

View OriginalReply0

BoredApeResistance

· 14h ago

AI is no longer just for chatting now, it's really getting things done Elsa's points system is okay, but the cross-chain experience is still quite challenging The positioning of connectors is quite accurate; DeFi needs such an intermediary layer Last year's AI applications were indeed a "tax on intelligence," but now they are finally somewhat useful By the way, could Elsa's incentive model be another form of disguised rug pull... Using AI as an adhesive is fine, but I'm worried it might just be a fleeting narrative Cross-chain integration is worth paying attention to; it would be amazing if operations could be truly smooth DeFi infrastructure needs this kind of thing, but it still depends on whether it can be successfully implemented later

View OriginalReply0