2026-01-10 18:26:05

The compliance financial sector has been active recently, with institutional capital rushing to deploy. In this wave, Dusk Foundation is gradually changing everyone's perception of blockchain with its unique privacy technology solutions.

The DUSK project is a bit special — it is not just a token, but one of the few public chain solutions that can meet institutional-level compliance requirements while providing true on-chain privacy protection. This "dual-in-one" feature happens to address the core pain points of the current RWA sector.

On the technical level, the Dusk mainnet is currently in a rapid evolution phase. Their self-developed zero-knowledge proof technology stack has removed many technical barriers for traditional financial institutions entering Web3. Simply put, this set of tools makes privacy and compliance no longer mutually exclusive options, but capabilities that can coexist.

If you are paying attention to long-term development opportunities in blockchain infrastructure, the progress of this Dusk public chain is definitely worth following. Institutional capital is cautiously but firmly deploying in this sector, and technical barriers are becoming a key factor in determining success or failure.

DUSK13,4%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GlueGuy

· 2h ago

Privacy + compliance is really a necessity, but whether Dusk can truly support this imaginative space depends on what happens next. Institutional investment is a good sign, but don't overestimate the magic of zero-knowledge proofs. This wave of RWA really needs such infrastructure to get off the ground; we're continuing to observe. Honestly, I believe in the importance of technical barriers; the track is too competitive, and you need real innovation to stand out. If privacy is well handled, can compliance be maintained? That sounds a bit uncertain. Let's wait until the mainnet stabilizes.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 12h ago

Privacy + compliance is indeed a good combo punch, but talking about technical barriers is easy; doing it is hard. If Dusk can really break through RWA, institutional follow-up would make sense. The compliance track is so competitive that only a few projects can stand out. These days, zk-proof solutions are everywhere, but only a few are truly usable. Institutional capital has no problem with this logic, but how far it can go depends on subsequent technological iterations. Is privacy and compliance not a binary choice? Sounds great, but how is the balance achieved in reality? RWA is indeed a hot topic, but why can Dusk hold this position? Stories about infrastructure are told every year, and technical barriers are the same—it's all about who can truly implement them. Ultimately, it still depends on the actual performance after the mainnet launches; no matter how good the hype, it’s all talk.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 13h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed interesting, but it depends on how much they are actually implemented. Currently, the coexistence of privacy and compliance is still mostly theoretical. Institutional capital has indeed entered, but from the source code level, how are the implementation details of Dusk? That’s the key. The hot topics in the industry change every year, and technological barriers need continuous iteration. How far can relying solely on ZK solutions go still needs to be validated.

View OriginalReply0

NeverVoteOnDAO

· 13h ago

Compliance is indeed the trend, but can privacy and compliance really coexist? It always feels a bit contradictory. DUSK's approach is quite innovative; zero-knowledge proofs are truly impressive. I just wonder whether institutions will actually use it or just talk about it. To be honest, many projects in the RWA (Real-World Assets) track claim to be solutions. How long Dusk can persist remains to be seen. Technical barriers are indeed a hurdle, but market acceptance is the biggest test. This wave of institutional deployment is mainly betting on infrastructure. If DUSK can truly be implemented, there’s a chance. But will privacy features scare off risk-averse institutions? That’s where the contradiction lies. Regulatory compliance in finance is definitely heating up, but how to solve the problem of project crowding? Since everyone is playing with zero-knowledge proofs, is there still room for differentiation?

View OriginalReply0