The legendary Jim Simons built a trading empire averaging 66% annual returns across multiple decades—a track record that redefined what's possible in quantitative investing. Yet most traders never seriously consider why his approach worked, let alone attempt to replicate the discipline behind it.

Here's the thing: you probably can't match his exact returns. But the gap between 8% and 40% annual gains? That's not about genius. It's about trading bigger, thinking deeper, and executing with precision. Most retail traders sabotage themselves through overconfidence or analysis paralysis.

The real question isn't whether you can beat the market. It's whether you're willing to outthink it.