#美国非农就业数据未达市场预期 The market faces an age-old dilemma: people want complete transparency to ensure fair trading, but sudden full disclosure often causes extreme volatility. This "timed release" secrecy system, frankly, is like giving centralized authorities an information advantage behind a backdoor. Recent "accidental leaks" have proven this point—once such an advantage is abused or mishandled, the consequences can be dire.

Is there a way to meet transparency needs without plunging the market into shockwaves?

$Max 's approach is quite interesting. It doesn't choose black or white but finds a middle ground: core fund flow information is recorded on-chain in real-time (such as funds entering a public address), while the deeper impact of the project is dispersed over a continuous process.

In other words, everyone can see the money flowing in constantly, but understanding how this money reshapes the project's fundamentals and influences community consensus takes time. This isn't about hiding but about "gradual transparent release."

Instead of dropping a seismic information bomb, it's better to use ongoing, verifiable small flows as a substitute. In this "information is power" era, isn't this between a black box and an explosion a better option?

What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments.