LONDON, March 5 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Financial markets have swung from fear to hope, pricing in the inflationary impact of the war in the Middle East but also seeming oddly blasé about how long ​the disruption will last. Tellingly, in both bouts of optimism and pessimism this week, the winning trades of the past ‌year appear to have run their course.

At first glance, financial markets seem to be painting a coherent picture since Donald Trump began his Iran war. Brent hovered around $83 a barrel on Thursday — up 21% on the month but far from the $100 plus levels expected under a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The implication ​is that blocking this vital trade artery for more than a few weeks would be so devastating that the countries involved ​won’t allow it.

The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

Other markets reflect a similar view that the war will push up inflation a bit but ⁠not be catastrophic. Equity indexes are slightly lower, energy stocks are higher, and the U.S. dollar has risen 1.3% since the attack on ​Iran thanks to America’s status as a net oil exporter. The S&P 500 has held up better than European and emerging market indexes, which ​rely more on imported energy. Government bonds have edged down on the assumption that central banks will turn a little more hawkish.

But many other current trends make little sense. Gold, a traditional inflation hedge, is down about 3% since the attacks. Consumer staples shares, think food and cleaning products, have been beaten by consumer discretionary ​ones — apparel, travel and cars — despite being less sensitive to household spending. “Growth” stocks, normally hurt most by rising rates, have beaten cheaper “value” names, like ​Universal Health Services. This includes software firms such as Adobe (ADBE.O), opens new tab, which had been battered by AI fears and had no obvious reason to do well. These movements ‌are mostly ⁠the opposite of what happened in 2022 after a similar energy shock: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

What ties this together is simple: assets that had been outperforming are now lagging, and vice versa. The year’s winning trades before the war were extensions of strategies that surged after Donald Trump’s tariff package last year. Many had become overstretched. So-called dedollarisation wagers were so popular that net short bets on the greenback using derivatives hit ​a five-year high of $22.8 billion in ​February, according to the Commodity ⁠Futures Trading Commission. Gold seemed to have become an unbeatable all weather asset, which is unsustainable. Fund flows into U.S. staples were at record highs.

Some of those underlying trends could theoretically continue: central banks may keep buying ​gold, and global investors look for alternatives to the dollar. But it is telling that, even as ​markets rebounded Wednesday, ⁠the old winning wagers kept underperforming – staples, for instance, fell another 0.5%. Every investment playbook eventually tires, and this crisis has revealed how worn out some pages already were.

Follow Jon Sindreu on X, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.

Context News

• Financial markets have been rattled by the war that has spread across the Middle East following the ⁠U.S.-Israeli attack ​on Iran. As of 1000 GMT on March 5, Brent oil prices traded at $83 ​a barrel.
• However, equities rebounded on March 4, on the back of a news report suggesting that Iran may be seeking a diplomatic solution, as well as President Donald Trump’s assurances ​to intervene to steady crude markets.

For more insights like these, click here, opens new tab to try Breakingviews for free.

Editing by Neil Unmack; Production by Shrabani Chakraborty

• Suggested Topics:
• Breakingviews

Breakingviews
Reuters Breakingviews is the world’s leading source of agenda-setting financial insight. As the Reuters brand for financial commentary, we dissect the big business and economic stories as they break around the world every day. A global team of about 30 correspondents in New York, London, Hong Kong and other major cities provides expert analysis in real time.

Sign up for a free trial of our full service at and follow us on X @Breakingviews and at www.breakingviews.com. All opinions expressed are those of the authors.

Share

• X

• Facebook

• Linkedin

• Email

• Link

Purchase Licensing Rights

Jon Sindreu

Thomson Reuters

Jon Sindreu is the London-based global economics editor for Breakingviews. He was previously a reporter and a columnist for the Wall Street Journal, where he covered macroeconomics, financial markets and aviation for 11 years. He holds a master’s degree in financial journalism from City St George’s, University of London. He also holds degrees in computer science and journalism from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, in his natal Catalonia.

• Email