Can "knowingly buying counterfeit goods" qualify for triple compensation?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Source: Fuzhou Evening News

To reach the claimed compensation amount, after the consumer initially purchased and found the product did not match the advertisement, they placed an order for 20 more sets of the same product. They then sued in court for “one refund plus triple compensation” on all 21 sets. Recently, the Cangshan Court concluded this sales contract dispute case and clarified the punitive damages in cases of “knowing and buying fake” products.

In September 2024, Mr. Lin purchased a shower head claiming to be made entirely of copper from an online store, paying 220.39 yuan. After confirming the received product did not match the description, the merchant refunded the money after communication. Later, Mr. Lin ordered 20 more sets of the same shower head, paying 5,545.52 yuan, and then sued the court for all 21 sets, requesting “one refund plus triple compensation.”

The court held that, for the first transaction, the merchant’s false advertising constituted consumer fraud and should bear the responsibility of “one refund plus triple compensation.” Since the payment was already refunded, the court ordered the merchant to pay an additional three times the compensation of 661.17 yuan.

Regarding the subsequent purchase of 20 sets, the court did not support the “one refund plus triple compensation” request, for two reasons: First, Mr. Lin purchased again knowing the true material of the product, so the merchant did not have malicious intent to deceive in this transaction; second, his purchase of 20 sets at once clearly exceeded the scope of “consumer needs for daily life” and did not fall under the protection of the Consumer Rights Protection Law.

The judge stated that the ruling clearly delineates the boundary between legitimate rights protection and abuse of rights. It warns merchants against false advertising and clarifies that the purpose of punitive damages is to protect consumers who have been defrauded, not to support consumers who knowingly buy fake products or seek to profit indirectly. (Reporter: Lin Chunchang; Correspondent: Lin Wei)

【Source: Taipingyang Net】

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin