Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Depth | How does NEAR differ from the Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem?
The NEAR protocol, as a Layer 1 public chain, has consistently pursued scalability and interoperability. Recently, the NEAR ecosystem has launched multiple Layer 2 solutions aimed at enhancing network performance and expanding application scenarios.
This article will compare the Layer 2 ecosystems of NEAR and Ethereum, exploring their similarities and differences.
NEAR's Layer 2 ecosystem
The Layer2 ecosystem of NEAR mainly includes three projects: Aurora, Calimero, and Kroma.
1. Aurora: EVM-compatible Layer 2 based on NEAR, supporting seamless migration of Ethereum dApps.
2. Calimero: A privacy-focused Layer 2 solution for enterprise-level applications.
3. Kroma: A Layer2 network based on zkWASM, supporting multiple programming languages.
These Layer 2 solutions each have their own focus, collectively building NEAR's multi-layer scaling ecosystem.
Ethereum's Layer 2 ecosystem
In comparison, the Layer2 ecosystem of Ethereum is richer and more mature:
1. Optimistic Rollups: such as Optimism, Arbitrum, etc.
2. ZK Rollups: such as zkSync, StarkNet, etc.
3. Validium: such as Immutable X.
4. Plasma: such as OMG Network.
Ethereum's Layer 2 solutions are more diverse and have a wider range of applications.
The similarities and differences between NEAR and the Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem
Similarities:
1. Both are committed to improving network throughput and reducing transaction costs.
2. Both use Rollup technology as the main scaling solution.
3. All support cross-chain interoperability.
Differences:
1. Technical Route: NEAR mainly adopts sharding technology, while Ethereum relies more on Layer 2.
2. Ecosystem Maturity: The Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem is more mature and diverse.
3. Application Scenarios: NEAR's Layer 2 focuses more on specific areas, such as enterprise applications and privacy protection.
4. Development Difficulty: The development threshold for NEAR is relatively low and supports multiple programming languages.
Conclusion
NEAR and Ethereum are both actively exploring Layer2 scaling solutions to address the challenges of blockchain scalability. Although Ethereum's Layer2 ecosystem is more mature, NEAR's unique advantages cannot be overlooked. In the future, both are expected to achieve breakthroughs in their respective technological paths, further promoting the development of blockchain technology.