In the cryptocurrency market, SAO vs NEAR comparison has always been a topic that investors cannot avoid. The two not only have significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning of crypto assets.
Sator (SAO): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its blockchain solution for broadcast television.
NEAR (NEAR): Since its launch in 2020, it has been hailed as a highly scalable base protocol, ensuring fast enough support for DApp operation on mobile devices.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between SAO and NEAR, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, and attempt to answer the question that investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
Click to view real-time prices:

Disclaimer: The above predictions are based on historical data and market analysis. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to rapid changes. These projections should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
SAO:
| 年份 | 预测最高价 | 预测平均价格 | 预测最低价 | 涨跌幅 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.000351044 | 0.0002356 | 0.000143716 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0.00034025352 | 0.000293322 | 0.00022585794 | 24 |
| 2027 | 0.0004086562104 | 0.00031678776 | 0.0002819411064 | 34 |
| 2028 | 0.00050781077928 | 0.0003627219852 | 0.000337331446236 | 53 |
| 2029 | 0.000587609616024 | 0.00043526638224 | 0.000339507778147 | 84 |
| 2030 | 0.000608611218967 | 0.000511437999132 | 0.000480751719184 | 116 |
NEAR:
| 年份 | 预测最高价 | 预测平均价格 | 预测最低价 | 涨跌幅 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.96296 | 2.002 | 1.44144 | 0 |
| 2026 | 2.5817792 | 2.48248 | 1.5639624 | 23 |
| 2027 | 2.835985152 | 2.5321296 | 1.696526832 | 25 |
| 2028 | 3.7576803264 | 2.684057376 | 1.82515901568 | 33 |
| 2029 | 4.799094588288 | 3.2208688512 | 2.641112457984 | 59 |
| 2030 | 4.6114789777056 | 4.009981719744 | 3.76938281655936 | 98 |
⚠️ Risk Warning: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice. None
Q1: What are the main differences between SAO and NEAR? A: SAO focuses on blockchain solutions for broadcast television, while NEAR is a highly scalable base protocol supporting DApp operation on mobile devices. SAO has a smaller market cap and higher volatility, whereas NEAR has a larger market cap and relatively higher liquidity.
Q2: Which token has performed better historically? A: Based on historical data, NEAR has shown relatively stronger performance during market downturns. In the 2022 bear market, NEAR declined from $20.44 to $0.526762, while SAO dropped from $1.28 to $0.00004711.
Q3: What are the price predictions for SAO and NEAR in 2030? A: For SAO, the base scenario predicts a range of $0.000511437999132 - $0.000608611218967. For NEAR, the base scenario predicts a range of $4.009981719744 - $4.6114789777056. However, these predictions are subject to market volatility and should not be considered financial advice.
Q4: How do the supply mechanisms of SAO and NEAR differ? A: SAO follows a market demand-driven model, while NEAR focuses on a technology innovation-driven model. These supply mechanisms influence price cycles based on the growth potential in their respective technology sectors.
Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in SAO and NEAR? A: Both tokens face market risks, technical risks, and regulatory risks. SAO has higher volatility due to its smaller market cap, while NEAR is more susceptible to overall crypto market trends. Technical risks include scalability and network stability for SAO, and computing power concentration and security vulnerabilities for NEAR.
Q6: How should different types of investors approach SAO and NEAR? A: Novice investors might consider NEAR for its larger market cap and higher liquidity. Experienced investors could create a balanced portfolio with both tokens, adjusting based on risk tolerance. Institutional investors should evaluate both based on technological advancements and ecosystem growth.
Share
Content