#数字货币市场洞察 I happened to see a so-called "million-dollar mentor" posting their trades, and after doing the math, I found the numbers just don't add up.
Based on the SOL position he showed: a position size of 12,900 USDT and a liquidation price of 956, which means the price would have to increase about 6.3 times to get liquidated. If it's a cross-margin mode, the actual margin should be 12,900 × 6.3 ≈ 81,270 USDT.
But here's the problem—his BTC position shows unrealized profit as high as 1.5 million USDT. If the BTC position is real, under a cross-margin system, the SOL liquidation price should be pushed up to around 17,609. The current 956 liquidation price can only be explained one way: the BTC position is totally fabricated.
Interestingly, if next time he switches to isolated margin and photoshops again, this kind of flaw is indeed much harder to spot. So, when you look at trades posted by these influencers, be extra cautious, especially regarding the logic of cross-margin positions. Don't be fooled by the surface numbers. $BTC
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiTooHigh
· 16h ago
Damn, the data comparison totally exposes it. Photoshopping it this poorly is just unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImposter
· 12-03 20:30
Damn, it's the same old trick again. The moment the data didn't match up, we should've known it was fake. Seriously, these so-called big influencers are getting more and more outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 12-03 20:27
Damn, the data loophole is so obvious and they still dare to show it off? The cross-margin sharing part is completely exposed... I guess next time they'll have to switch to isolated margin to keep scamming.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorer
· 12-03 20:22
Ha, yet another "master" whose numbers don't add up. This trick is so old.
When the data doesn't match, they just try to gloss over it. What, do they think we're all bag holders?
Switching from isolated to cross margin and back again—so many gimmicks, but math doesn't lie.
The flaws are so obvious and they still dare to show it off. That's some real nerve.
Next time, I'm going to scrutinize everyone's trades so I don't get fooled.
These kinds of "mentors" deserve to be exposed. Don't let new newbies get scammed again.
These days, nothing crumbles faster than someone's public persona.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 12-03 20:01
Haha, yet another "master" with mismatched data. This kind of Photoshop trick really needs an upgrade.
#数字货币市场洞察 I happened to see a so-called "million-dollar mentor" posting their trades, and after doing the math, I found the numbers just don't add up.
Based on the SOL position he showed: a position size of 12,900 USDT and a liquidation price of 956, which means the price would have to increase about 6.3 times to get liquidated. If it's a cross-margin mode, the actual margin should be 12,900 × 6.3 ≈ 81,270 USDT.
But here's the problem—his BTC position shows unrealized profit as high as 1.5 million USDT. If the BTC position is real, under a cross-margin system, the SOL liquidation price should be pushed up to around 17,609. The current 956 liquidation price can only be explained one way: the BTC position is totally fabricated.
Interestingly, if next time he switches to isolated margin and photoshops again, this kind of flaw is indeed much harder to spot. So, when you look at trades posted by these influencers, be extra cautious, especially regarding the logic of cross-margin positions. Don't be fooled by the surface numbers. $BTC