$80 Million Bitcoin Theft Case Reversed: Exchange Sued for "Failure to Freeze Stolen Funds" Returns to Court

robot
Abstract generation in progress

[Crypto World] On December 4, a major breakthrough occurred in a case involving the theft of $80 million worth of Bitcoin. On Wednesday, the Third District Court of Appeal in Florida overturned the initial trial verdict, allowing fraud victims to refile a lawsuit against a leading crypto exchange in state court.

The core issue in this case is that the exchange is accused of failing to continuously freeze the stolen funds. The trial court had originally dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds of “lack of personal jurisdiction” over the platform, but the appellate court found this determination to be erroneous.

This case could have a far-reaching impact on the industry—when user assets are stolen on a platform, how much responsibility should exchanges bear? Are the platform’s fund-freezing measures sufficient? With the litigation set to resume, these questions may soon receive clearer legal answers.

BTC-2.67%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DancingCandlesvip
· 20h ago
Wow, the exchange is getting sued again... This time it really seems unavoidable.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollectorvip
· 12-03 23:46
Exchanges are now being sued for failing to freeze funds effectively. It's about time these platforms were regulated.
View OriginalReply0
LostBetweenChainsvip
· 12-03 23:24
$80 million, and the exchange couldn't even freeze it—this is truly unbelievable. --- Really? The platform is this bad? How are there still people daring to keep their coins on exchanges? --- Finally, a court that understands what's going on. Let's see how the exchange tries to shift the blame this time. --- The key point remains: if your coins are on an exchange, they're not really your coins. Self-custody or not? --- Waiting for the verdict—if the exchange is actually ordered to pay compensation, the whole industry landscape will change.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 12-03 23:22
$80 million, and the exchange still wants to shift the blame—unbelievable. The platform should take responsibility when it's due, stop playing those legal loophole games all the time. Well, this is getting interesting, let's wait and see what happens next.
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyervip
· 12-03 23:21
Haha, what a twist, the exchange has to go to court again. --- 80 million... This freeze measure really needs to be closely monitored, otherwise who would dare keep their coins on an exchange? --- Finally, someone is standing up for the victims. This ruling reversal is beautiful. --- Waiting to see how the exchange tries to shift the blame. I bet there will be more shady moves. --- To put it simply, the platform needs to take responsibility. If you can't freeze the funds, don't charge fees. --- Now that this case is trending, other exchanges are panicking. The rules will have to change. --- An 80 million major case, and this time the court is clearly siding with the victims. --- That's the problem—if the platform is one second late freezing the funds, the money is gone. Who's responsible?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)