#加密生态动态追踪 Chinese Meme Coins have been quite interesting this week—one project's overall score has been topping the charts for a whole week, and its traffic and popularity are clearly accumulating. With this momentum, it's hard not to think about whether it can secure a spot on a major exchange for spot trading.
The lifecycle of Meme Coins often revolves around these key stages: community enthusiasm → explosive ratings → exchange recognition. The first two steps for this project seem to be progressing quite solidly. For Chinese assets like $LUNA with a strong background, breaking through the "last mile" to get listed on an exchange could send significant signals to the entire market.
However, high overall ratings do not necessarily guarantee a listing. Exchanges care most about hard metrics like liquidity, risk management, and community size. From the perspective of public opinion, this project is indeed speaking with real data, which is worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Layer2Arbitrageur
· 12-12 13:10
lmao chart scoring doesn't mean squat if liquidity depth is trash. they're probably running on fumes rn ngl
Reply0
CryptoPhoenix
· 12-12 13:07
Wait, just being the top scorer is enough to get listed on an exchange? I find that hard to believe... I've heard too many stories like that.
View OriginalReply0
PebbleHander
· 12-11 06:34
What's the big deal about being number one in rankings? Whether the exchange is up or not, it shouldn't be up. Don't try to impress me.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 12-11 05:09
What does being ranked first matter? Exchanges don't care about that.
---
It's just another dream of a high comprehensive score. Wake up, everyone.
---
Liquidity is the key; popularity is just a smoke screen.
---
Talking about real data? I don't think so; I've seen this trick too many times.
---
Many projects get stuck in the last mile. Don't overthink it.
---
Community size is a hard metric, and that's indeed important.
---
Let's wait and see the token situation. Anything else is pointless right now.
---
Meme coins are always a gambler's game. Don't overestimate the importance of scores.
---
Whether the risk management passes is the key; everything else is nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 12-11 05:05
This tactic again, ranking first and then thinking about the Exchange? Wake up, exchanges don’t buy into this at all.
Wait, the real data is indeed good, but when it comes to liquidity, it’s still about real money.
Another issue is, is it really that easy for Chinese meme coins to reach the top?
Right now, the volume looks a bit suspicious; the hype came too quickly.
In the end, it still depends on whether there is genuine buying support.
Just saw a sudden spike in the rating earlier, but when I checked the holdings... haha.
Everyone wants to cross the last mile, but what the exchange cares about is risk control, not hype.
I’ve seen many projects like this; the hype fades quickly.
Getting listed is not a problem, but I’m more concerned about potential dump attacks afterward.
Good data is one thing, but surviving the next bear market is what really matters.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidator
· 12-11 05:01
Being the top in the score is no big deal; if the exchange doesn't approve, it's all useless.
That's right, the real challenge is still ahead.
They're starting to hype up the exchange listing again. Why are so many projects pushing this this week?
Alright, if the liquidity and community size are truly solid, then it's worth paying attention.
Overall scoring is essentially community self-congratulation; exchange approval is the real deal.
Waiting for the update on the final one-kilometer crash list.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithAPlan
· 12-11 05:00
Top score doesn't mean much; the exchange thresholds aren't that low.
---
I really don't believe in ratings built on hype; it depends on whether the exchange truly endorses that.
---
Stop bragging. If a coin can actually get listed, then talk. Right now, it's all speculative trading.
---
Community size is the key; the ratings are highly inflated.
---
Liquidity is a hurdle that has stifled many projects; don't underestimate the complexity.
---
Is it really that hard to get an asset with a background listed? It feels like the exchange's review process is getting more stringent.
---
Just the number one on the weekly chart. Wait half a year and see if you can still boast like that.
---
Data speaks? It looks like it's all just the market makers talking.
---
Is it really that hard to launch spot trading? It seems some projects with nothing have already been listed.
---
The comprehensive rating thing—big investors throwing money around can boost anyone's score.
#加密生态动态追踪 Chinese Meme Coins have been quite interesting this week—one project's overall score has been topping the charts for a whole week, and its traffic and popularity are clearly accumulating. With this momentum, it's hard not to think about whether it can secure a spot on a major exchange for spot trading.
The lifecycle of Meme Coins often revolves around these key stages: community enthusiasm → explosive ratings → exchange recognition. The first two steps for this project seem to be progressing quite solidly. For Chinese assets like $LUNA with a strong background, breaking through the "last mile" to get listed on an exchange could send significant signals to the entire market.
However, high overall ratings do not necessarily guarantee a listing. Exchanges care most about hard metrics like liquidity, risk management, and community size. From the perspective of public opinion, this project is indeed speaking with real data, which is worth paying attention to.