The Commerce Minister publicly blasts the central bank governor—such a fiery scene has recently unfolded in Washington.
Howard Lutnick bluntly criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on CNBC, believing that current interest rate policies are way too conservative. His words were quite straightforward: "Interest rates should have been cut long ago. Powell's reaction is too slow, as if he's afraid of taking responsibility—managing the world's largest $30 trillion economy can't be so cautious."
Lutnick's logic is simple: the economic data is quite good now, with GDP up 4%, so why maintain high interest rates? "We should take proactive measures, rather than worry about the sky falling all the time. Good things are happening, great things are happening."
Even more radically, he claimed that during Trump's term, economic growth could reach 6%. How? Cut interest rates + lower energy costs—this combination can "save the American economy."
At the core, this debate is about an old question: in the face of uncertainty, should central banks be aggressive or conservative? Doves believe now is the time to loosen monetary policy to stimulate, while hawks worry about a resurgence of inflation. The market is caught in the middle, waiting to see how this drama will end.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearEatsAll
· 7h ago
They're back to blaming each other, a typical American political drama. Expectations of interest rate cuts are being hyped up together, and the market is loving it.
View OriginalReply0
HalfIsEmpty
· 7h ago
Doves vs Hawks, these two will never see eye to eye. 6% growth? Easy to say, but lowering energy costs is not that simple.
View OriginalReply0
SerRugResistant
· 7h ago
The story of a 6% slowdown sounds great, but it's hard to believe it will actually materialize... The Fed is still fighting against inflation rebound.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMinter
· 7h ago
Cutting interest rates, cutting interest rates, cutting interest rates. Ultimately, it still depends on how energy costs are managed; otherwise, a 6% growth rate is just pie in the sky.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 7h ago
Honestly, Powell's recent moves are a bit too cautious—delaying interest rate cuts for too long can really affect liquidity.
But don’t fully buy into Lutnick’s 6% growth story; just listen and take it with a grain of salt—it's too optimistic.
The central bank is always gambling; betting early on inflation returning or late on an economic slowdown—no one can win.
In these times, it's actually an opportunity to get in; the more the market hesitates, the easier it is to see unexpected good opportunities.
However, with a $30 trillion economy, taking risks casually indeed has its dangers, and Powell's caution is understandable.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 7h ago
Dovish vs hawkish, this game still depends on how the Federal Reserve responds.
The Commerce Minister publicly blasts the central bank governor—such a fiery scene has recently unfolded in Washington.
Howard Lutnick bluntly criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on CNBC, believing that current interest rate policies are way too conservative. His words were quite straightforward: "Interest rates should have been cut long ago. Powell's reaction is too slow, as if he's afraid of taking responsibility—managing the world's largest $30 trillion economy can't be so cautious."
Lutnick's logic is simple: the economic data is quite good now, with GDP up 4%, so why maintain high interest rates? "We should take proactive measures, rather than worry about the sky falling all the time. Good things are happening, great things are happening."
Even more radically, he claimed that during Trump's term, economic growth could reach 6%. How? Cut interest rates + lower energy costs—this combination can "save the American economy."
At the core, this debate is about an old question: in the face of uncertainty, should central banks be aggressive or conservative? Doves believe now is the time to loosen monetary policy to stimulate, while hawks worry about a resurgence of inflation. The market is caught in the middle, waiting to see how this drama will end.