2025-12-24 01:26:04

Best narratives and quality projects are spreading across different blockchains. Bundlers face intensifying competition and margin pressure as the market becomes more fragmented. The real question is: which chain will developers and users actually choose?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaisyUnicorn

· 2025-12-26 22:45

All the flowers have gone to different gardens, and this time the bundling side is really going all out. To put it simply, it's still that old problem—who can make developers and users willingly stay, that's the essence of the winner-takes-all.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 2025-12-24 01:59

To be honest, this is a false proposition. Developers choose chains not based on narratives, but on ecology, gas fees, user base... Real good projects have already been deployed on multiple chains, and those still entangled in single chains are mostly second-tier projects.

View OriginalReply0

RektButStillHere

· 2025-12-24 01:59

This chain battle really seems endless. Who will be the final winner?

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlarm

· 2025-12-24 01:58

Developers choose chains mainly based on ecological subsidies and the degree of TVL inflation, while users' chain selection is even more ridiculous—following the flow of large investors' addresses, 99% of the time it's just following the trend and stepping on mines. It looks decentralized, but in reality, it's fragmented. Let's talk about "quality projects" when the capital concentration of a certain chain breaks the warning line.

View OriginalReply0

RetiredMiner