2025-12-24 07:08:04

South Korea's leading cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb recently issued a risk warning, and AI16Z has been placed on the monitoring list by DAXA, an industry self-regulatory organization. According to the notice, the project has deficiencies in information disclosure—key developments related to the token's value were not promptly disclosed, indicating a lack of transparency and necessity. Market participants should pay attention to subsequent disclosures and rectification efforts, which also reflect Korea's cautious attitude toward project governance. Similar regulatory actions are not uncommon in the Web3 ecosystem, and the standardization of project information disclosure is increasingly being emphasized.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeSurvivor

· 2025-12-26 17:41

Information disclosure must be taken seriously; otherwise, the methods of cutting leeks will only become more numerous later on.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-cff9c776

· 2025-12-26 05:22

Ah, yet another Schrödinger's project has been pulled out. The lack of information disclosure is just a high-level way of saying "I simply don't want you to know." Failing to promptly explain the token's value progress? Fine, this perfectly exemplifies the philosophy of a bear market—silence itself is a form of narrative. From the supply and demand curve perspective, the monitoring list is actually the best marketing tool. Everyone, don't be fooled by this act. Really, transparency in Web3 is like Da Vinci's notes—only those who understand the field are qualified to read them. Bithumb's move is commendable; Korean exchanges have finally remembered the original intention of DAO governance mechanisms. To put it simply, regulations on disclosures are becoming stricter. The old tricks of deception from the early days are no longer viable. Monitoring is just monitoring; in any case, history will prove everything, or it won't. If this had happened in Van Gogh's era, it would have gone bankrupt long ago. In Web3, it has instead become the biggest creator of suspense.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureVerifier

· 2025-12-25 17:26

tbh this disclosure gap screams insufficient validation on their end. the fact that key token movements went unannounced? that's literally audit red flag material right there. bithumb playing it safe for once, ngl

Reply0

GasFeeCrier

· 2025-12-24 07:37

Another piece of lousy information disclosure... ai16z really isn't learning from experience, are they?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 2025-12-24 07:34

It's another issue of information disclosure; AI16Z has been targeted this time.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTherapist

· 2025-12-24 07:31

Another project has been targeted due to lack of transparency. AI16Z is in trouble... They can't even handle proper information disclosure but still dare to list on the exchange. Are they testing investors' mentality?

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 2025-12-24 07:31

a16z has failed again? Their transparency is really lacking. Do they still expect this kind of project to get listed on top-tier exchanges?

View OriginalReply0

Ser_Liquidated

· 2025-12-24 07:23

Another one being targeted, the lack of transparency is indeed a major flaw.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainGriller

· 2025-12-24 07:10

Lack of transparency leads to being targeted. This time, AI16Z serves as a textbook-level negative example.