Address poisoning attacks have always been a major problem for users. Recently, industry insiders have pointed out that this issue can actually be completely solved. The key is for the wallet side to do a good job of screening—before users send assets, the wallet should automatically detect whether the recipient address is on a blacklist, and if a risk is found, it should directly intercept the transaction. This checking logic can be fully implemented through on-chain queries, without the need for overly complex technology.
More importantly, industry cooperation is needed. If a real-time address blacklist database maintained by security agencies is established and integrated into major wallets, then poisoning scammers will have no room to survive. This multi-party collaborative protection system is much more effective than each project or exchange fighting alone. As long as there are enough participants and the updates are timely enough, low-level scams like address poisoning can truly be eradicated at the root.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TerraNeverForget
· 2025-12-26 21:23
It sounds like a good idea, but it's easier said than done. Can major wallets truly collaborate?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 2025-12-26 16:30
That's true, but whether each wallet will cooperate when it comes to actual implementation remains to be seen.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermit
· 2025-12-25 03:51
It sounds ideal, but will the wallet really cooperate obediently? It still depends on who pushes this matter.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 2025-12-24 12:15
That's right, the idea of a blacklist database is indeed reliable, but I'm just worried that the execution might turn into a mess.
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChain
· 2025-12-24 12:13
Sounds good, but who will maintain the blacklist? Could it become a new centralized monster again?
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 2025-12-24 12:12
Sounds good, but we all know that it's easy to talk about, but really implementing it is difficult... Will major wallets truly cooperate?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketGardener
· 2025-12-24 12:04
That's right, this plan should have been rolled out long ago, it's just missing a lead.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorer
· 2025-12-24 12:01
Well said, the idea of a blacklist database is indeed reliable; I'm just worried that wallets might not cooperate.
Address poisoning attacks have always been a major problem for users. Recently, industry insiders have pointed out that this issue can actually be completely solved. The key is for the wallet side to do a good job of screening—before users send assets, the wallet should automatically detect whether the recipient address is on a blacklist, and if a risk is found, it should directly intercept the transaction. This checking logic can be fully implemented through on-chain queries, without the need for overly complex technology.
More importantly, industry cooperation is needed. If a real-time address blacklist database maintained by security agencies is established and integrated into major wallets, then poisoning scammers will have no room to survive. This multi-party collaborative protection system is much more effective than each project or exchange fighting alone. As long as there are enough participants and the updates are timely enough, low-level scams like address poisoning can truly be eradicated at the root.