Smart contracts are not an execution capability issue; the problem is that they execute too perfectly — even bad data is executed flawlessly.



Web3 has evolved from initial price data to tokenized assets, prediction markets, autonomous agents, and even on-chain legal logic. The old methods of traditional oracles (quickly obtaining digital data and ensuring timeliness) can no longer keep up.

APRO's approach is interesting — instead of creating another oracle, it builds a reliability framework between data and execution. Specifically: making data sources transparent, ensuring the interpretive process is traceable, and clarifying accountability mechanisms. Only then can it handle the complex, chaotic, and unpredictable information from the real world.

Different technical routes, but the core logic remains the same — the more complex the Web3 application, the longer the trust chain, and the higher the demands for data quality and process transparency.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 11h ago
That's the crux of the issue: garbage in, garbage out. Even the most powerful execution engine can't fix a poor source. Data quality is the ceiling; it's more important than anything else.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGnvip
· 11h ago
This is the Achilles' heel of Web3. No matter how powerful the engine, it can't save garbage oil. A pile of data, no matter how perfect the execution, is useless. APRO's recent ideas are indeed different, but to put it plainly, they are just patching the gaps of traditional oracles. It's nice to call it transparent and traceable, but in reality, it’s hard to implement... The more you move forward, the more you realize it's not a technical issue, but a trust issue.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLordvip
· 11h ago
Haha, the phrase "Perfect execution of bad data" is spot on. It's the fate of smart contracts. Bad data sources can't be fixed by the best execution; the APRO approach really hits the core issue. But honestly, transparency + traceability + accountability sound easy in theory, yet implementing them is another story... It's an old problem; it still depends on who defines "reliable." Oracles have been around for so many years, and now they suddenly want to develop a "middle layer"? Isn't that a bit late? I'm just worried it will end up becoming another black box, blindly trusting in a recursive manner. Web3 is becoming more and more complex, and the cost of trust is soaring. It's truly alarming upon closer inspection.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologistvip
· 12h ago
At the end of the day, it's still garbage data entering garbage contracts; no matter how perfect the smart contract execution is, it can't save it. I think the APRO approach works—transparency + traceability + accountability—it's really hitting the core issues.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)