Looking at PIPPIN's recent trend, there's an interesting phenomenon. After liquidity dried up, this coin only started trading frequently. Calculations show that just the fee costs have almost eaten up the early principal. For ordinary retail investors, they would have already found a chance to cut losses and exit.
But it's different here—PIPPIN has touched the cost price three times after dropping from a high level, and not once has it chosen to exit. Today, there's another surge. Looking at this rhythm, combined with the market voices, it doesn't seem like an independent action.
What's even more interesting is the trading technique. Repeatedly inserting and withdrawing the needle, back and forth, both triggering long-side stop losses and short-side liquidations. How attractive is this combo to retail investors? It's self-evident. One person says they don't care about this little money, while another explains why a big move can't happen—these two statements together are probably not a coincidence.
In plain terms, the purpose of this repeated probing might be to maximize attracting participants to enter the market. Large institutions are not lacking in patience; they will grind it out little by little. Is it possible that everyone—whether KOLs or retail investors—is being repeatedly harvested at some point in this game? It's a question worth pondering.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_we_are_ngmi
· 8h ago
It's the same old trick again, inserting the stop-loss pin is really brilliant.
Big institutions are just patient; retail investors have already gone bankrupt.
It feels like we're all being cut in the game, including those self-proclaimed indifferent KOLs.
This rhythm is indeed strange, not like a natural trend.
Fees are almost exhausted the principal, yet they keep going, a typical probing tactic.
This combination of moves is just a trap for retail investors.
Thinking about it, it's really frightening; no one can escape this cycle.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermit
· 8h ago
It's the same old trick again, inserting needles to harvest a one-stop service, retail investors losing everything and having to reflect on themselves.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisser
· 8h ago
It's the same old trick again. Three times to recover the investment and still no luck. What does that say?
The institutions are toying with us. Retail investors are just like grass for the harvest.
This needle-insertion technique is really ruthless, collecting both long and short positions. We small retail investors are just destined to be wool pulled over our eyes.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMiner
· 8h ago
I've seen this tactic too many times, repeatedly using stop-loss hunting—basically, it's just fishing.
Not exiting indicates what—it's just the whales slowly accumulating.
Retail investors entering are just destined to be taken advantage of.
Looking at PIPPIN's recent trend, there's an interesting phenomenon. After liquidity dried up, this coin only started trading frequently. Calculations show that just the fee costs have almost eaten up the early principal. For ordinary retail investors, they would have already found a chance to cut losses and exit.
But it's different here—PIPPIN has touched the cost price three times after dropping from a high level, and not once has it chosen to exit. Today, there's another surge. Looking at this rhythm, combined with the market voices, it doesn't seem like an independent action.
What's even more interesting is the trading technique. Repeatedly inserting and withdrawing the needle, back and forth, both triggering long-side stop losses and short-side liquidations. How attractive is this combo to retail investors? It's self-evident. One person says they don't care about this little money, while another explains why a big move can't happen—these two statements together are probably not a coincidence.
In plain terms, the purpose of this repeated probing might be to maximize attracting participants to enter the market. Large institutions are not lacking in patience; they will grind it out little by little. Is it possible that everyone—whether KOLs or retail investors—is being repeatedly harvested at some point in this game? It's a question worth pondering.