Midnight at 2 a.m. You’ve already fallen asleep, but the robot on the other end of the screen is busy—swiping cards, fetching data, signing contracts—all looking very "compliant." When morning comes and you open your wallet, you find your balance has shrunk, and the on-chain logs only leave a cold and icy message: "Completed."

There’s no Hollywood-style hacker confrontation, no alarms sounding. All there is are speed, trust, and that authorization link you once clicked and agreed to.

This is the real story that has been repeatedly playing out in the recent crypto market. We hand over the permission keys to tireless code, only to pretend we know nothing after something goes wrong. I once spent hours tracking an abnormal flow on a certain chain, trying to find that "bad actor." The more I investigated, the more terrifying it became—the chain itself was fine, the contract logic was sound, and signature verification passed. The real vulnerability actually came from that phrase we once said: "This proxy, it probably won’t break anyway."

So when I first delved into KITE, I felt a mix of anticipation and concern—half expecting, half worried. Who wouldn’t want automatic payments and automated workflows? But the key issue was so straightforward: how can you be sure that once you hand over this key, it won’t be treated like that spoon of sugar given to a child?

KITE’s approach is different. It doesn’t boast about "TPS skyrocketing" or "speed unbeatable." It focuses on another dimension—the design of a truly secure and controllable underlying architecture for proxy programs.

Within KITE’s framework, a proxy might only run for ten minutes, call a few functional modules, execute a batch of small transactions, then complete the task and automatically revoke permissions. The efficiency is high, but the real test has only just begun.