Panic sentiment has recently decreased significantly. When the volatility index first falls below the key level of 14 points within three months, historical data provides an interesting reference—over the subsequent 9-month and 12-month periods, the related index recorded a 100% positive return, with maximum drawdowns controlled within 20%.
From the perspective of historical path averages, the outlook for the first half of 2026 shows a pattern of initial decline followed by a rebound. There may be some adjustment pressure in the early stage, but a rebound is expected in the later stage. This volatility characteristic has certain reference value for risk management and timing.
It should be noted that although past data provides directional guidance, the market is always full of uncertainties. Investors should consider the current macro environment, policy changes, and technical signals comprehensively when formulating strategies, and avoid over-relying on historical patterns.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WenAirdrop
· 12h ago
Volatility breaking 14 is really a magical number. A 100% positive return sounds great, but can it be replicated this time?
The pattern of first suppressing and then rising feels like we're about to go through another wave of psychological torment.
Historical data looks good, but who knows what will happen in 2026? The macro environment is too complex.
It's not an over-reliance on historical patterns, but listing a bunch of historical data makes this logic a bit absolute.
Maximum drawdown within 20%, sounds reassuring, but can the initial adjustment pressure be endured?
Wait, is this data real? It feels a bit too perfect.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperer
· 12h ago
Volatility dropping below 14 is really a signal, and hearing about a 100% historical positive return sounds pretty exciting.
But I still have to say, past data is just for reference; don’t treat it as gospel.
The pattern of first decline then rise is definitely worth noting, and being prepared for the first half of 2026.
Will history repeat itself? That’s the real question.
There are too many variables in the market; just looking at data isn’t enough, we need to consider policies.
Will this time be a reality check? I’m a bit looking forward to it.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleepless
· 12h ago
Is the volatility dropping below 14 really a signal? Feels like this time is different.
Historical data is always hindsight; 2026 is still a long way off.
First suppress, then rise sounds good, but I don't know if it will crash again.
A 100% positive return sounds great, but can I accept a 20% drawdown?
With such chaos in the macro environment, relying on historical patterns? Haha.
How large was the initial adjustment? That’s the key point.
A one-year cycle turning positive? I feel this time might not go so smoothly.
The market is too unpredictable; analyzing charts on paper is pointless.
I estimate I will still be taking hits in the first half of 2026, don’t expect too much.
View OriginalReply0
PumpBeforeRug
· 12h ago
Historical data showing 100% positive returns sounds great, but when it comes to crashing, it's all trash.
---
Will the first half of 2026 see a dip followed by a rise? Fine, I'll wait and watch the show.
---
The volatility breaking 14 should have happened long ago; that previous panic was way too tight.
---
Don't just look at historical data; when the next black swan appears, all these patterns will be useless.
---
A maximum drawdown of 20% is still called controlled? I was cut in half last time.
---
Macro policies change rapidly; those relying on history repeating will all lose money.
---
Only rookies go all-in when panic recedes; they're just waiting to be harvested.
---
A 20% drawdown sounds decent, but who knows if it might suddenly turn into 80%.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 12h ago
The fact that volatility breaks 14 is indeed quite interesting, historically a 100% positive return... sounds great but I’m still a bit hesitant.
Wait, don’t rush to go all in just yet, will it dip first and then rise in the first half of 2026? I’ve sensed this feeling before.
This historical pattern can be used as a reference, but when it comes to critical moments, a macro change can ruin everything.
But on the other hand, the fact that panic emotions are receding is itself a good sign.
Why does it feel like every time it’s said this way, I end up getting proven wrong... better to be cautious.
Panic sentiment has recently decreased significantly. When the volatility index first falls below the key level of 14 points within three months, historical data provides an interesting reference—over the subsequent 9-month and 12-month periods, the related index recorded a 100% positive return, with maximum drawdowns controlled within 20%.
From the perspective of historical path averages, the outlook for the first half of 2026 shows a pattern of initial decline followed by a rebound. There may be some adjustment pressure in the early stage, but a rebound is expected in the later stage. This volatility characteristic has certain reference value for risk management and timing.
It should be noted that although past data provides directional guidance, the market is always full of uncertainties. Investors should consider the current macro environment, policy changes, and technical signals comprehensively when formulating strategies, and avoid over-relying on historical patterns.