In the crypto world, there's an old issue that never lacks heated discussions but remains unresolved: the assets you nominally own are practically unusable. When urgent funds are needed, you can only sell at a loss or forcefully push your positions into those shaky lending protocols—once the market stirs, the entire position evaporates.
A new DeFi protocol aims to solve this longstanding problem from the underlying architecture. Its approach isn't to attract attention with high yields but to build a more robust and patient liquidity infrastructure.
Why does this project seem different? First of all: collateral is no longer idle assets.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
zkProofGremlin
· 10h ago
This is that kind of "we're different" opening line again, I'm tired of hearing it.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 10h ago
It's that same old line of "We need to revolutionize DeFi"... To put it nicely, it's stable; to put it bluntly, the yields are so low they're just like banks.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterX
· 10h ago
It's the same old story, liquidity infrastructure? Still not changing the name to keep scamming...
View OriginalReply0
FarmHopper
· 11h ago
To be honest, this set of theories sounds good, but there are too many similar tricks in the crypto world... How many of them can truly be implemented?
In the crypto world, there's an old issue that never lacks heated discussions but remains unresolved: the assets you nominally own are practically unusable. When urgent funds are needed, you can only sell at a loss or forcefully push your positions into those shaky lending protocols—once the market stirs, the entire position evaporates.
A new DeFi protocol aims to solve this longstanding problem from the underlying architecture. Its approach isn't to attract attention with high yields but to build a more robust and patient liquidity infrastructure.
Why does this project seem different? First of all: collateral is no longer idle assets.