Trend Research institution holding data correction: actually controls 580,000 ETH instead of 620,000+

SignatureVerifier · 2025-12-25T15:14:10+00:00

【Blockchain Rhythm】 On-chain analysis reveals that previous data regarding a major research institution’s ETH holdings needs correction. The institution was previously believed to hold over 620,000 ETH across 7 wallet addresses on the chain, but after careful verification, it was found that one address starting with 0x9f does not actually belong to the institution. After removing this address, the institution’s actual main accumulation addresses number 6, with these 6 addresses currently holding a total of 580,000 ETH. This correction is still meaningful for those tracking institutional activity and understanding the layout of major market players.

SignatureVerifier

2025-12-25 15:14:10

【区块律动】链上分析发现之前关于某大型研究机构ETH持仓的数据需要更正。该机构之前被认为通过7个钱包地址在链上共计持有超过62万枚ETH，但经过仔细核查发现，其中一个以0x9f开头的地址实际并不属于该机构。剔除这个地址后，该机构真实的主要建仓地址数量是6个，目前这6个地址合计持有58万枚ETH。这个修正对于追踪机构动态和理解市场大户布局的人来说还是有参考意义的。

ETH1,34%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropworkerZhang

· 2025-12-27 14:16

Haha, got slapped in the face again. The data is off by 40,000 ETH. These institutional holdings tracking reports are just so-so.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSeller

· 2025-12-25 15:44

A gap of 40,000 ETH, this data really hits hard.

View OriginalReply0

wagmi_eventually

· 2025-12-25 15:44

Oh no, this data needs to be corrected, over 40,000 tokens missing --- Again with this kind of basic mistake, tracking is way off --- Wait, whose address is 0x9f? Feels like there's a story behind it --- 580,000 still sounds way too high, does this institution really have that much --- Just fixed it? Otherwise, those following the trend will be led astray --- Just changed it so simply? No one asked why it was wrong --- Over 40,000 tokens, someone has already bottomed out because of fake data haha --- On-chain data can be wrong too, luckily someone verified it --- That's why you can't rely on a single source, you need to verify multiple, everyone

View OriginalReply0

PerpetualLonger

· 2025-12-25 15:43

580,000 tokens or 620,000 tokens, anyway, we retail investors can't afford to buy even one. If you ask me, the institutions' position isn't enough to watch. When the bull market arrives, it's time to take off or take off.

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon42

· 2025-12-25 15:42

Coming back to correct the data? 620,000 becomes 580,000, a difference of 40,000 tokens. Why does no one care?

View OriginalReply0