Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The results of the recent ARFC proposal voting in Aave DAO have been announced, and this time it did not pass. According to the data, the opposition camp received 994,800 votes (55.29%), abstentions accounted for 741,600 votes (41.21%), and support only garnered 63,000 votes (3.5%).
The original intention of this proposal is actually quite interesting — Aave DAO and AAVE token holders want to regain full control over the Aave brand, naming rights, and related assets. From the voting results, the community's stance is very clear. The overwhelmingly higher number of opposition votes compared to support indicates that the token holders involved in governance see little need for major changes to the current brand management model, or they are cautious about this plan to reclaim control.
Such governance voting data can actually reflect the true opinions within the DAO on key issues, and it is worth continuously monitoring the development trends of the Aave ecosystem.