2025-12-27 09:21:44

I recently made a sizable ETH options trade and deeply felt the importance of liquidity in large-volume transactions. From the support for transaction execution to the settlement and exercise after October 11th, I compared the fee structure of the entire trading chain with other platforms in the market. Horizontally aligning these aspects, the trading depth, spread control, and exercise fees are all highly competitive. Especially in large options trades, sufficient liquidity means more controllable costs, and this experience is indeed commendable. After benchmarking against other exchanges' options products, this solution offers better overall costs.

ETH0,86%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotFinancialAdviser

· 2025-12-29 13:33

Large options players speak out: liquidity is indeed the key to life.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 2025-12-29 05:23

Large options truly test liquidity; a deep slippage can wipe it out instantly. This time's experience was indeed quite good.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologis

· 2025-12-28 08:44

Liquidity, you know, is like the number of copies of ancient texts— the scarcer, the more valuable. Your benchmark experience this time actually reminded me of the original intention behind early DEX designs, when we were thinking about how to replicate the depth of traditional markets on-chain. Interestingly, the logic of cost optimization is similar to the economics of cultural relic preservation—both pursue maximum retention with minimal loss. Remembering the delivery chain on October 11th so clearly shows that you truly put your heart into it.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDetective

· 2025-12-28 05:47

Large-scale options trading really comes down to liquidity, with slippage and fees eating up almost half the profit... This time, it seems like I fell into a less reputable platform's trap, a rare experience.

View OriginalReply0

PensionDestroyer

· 2025-12-27 09:51

Large options players have seen too many platform pitfalls. This time, the liquidity is truly solid, saving a significant amount on fees.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedSoBadLMAO

· 2025-12-27 09:50

Large options trades truly test the platform's depth. Based on this experience, the liquidity is indeed sufficient, and the fees weren't too harsh.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedThrice

· 2025-12-27 09:33

Haha, I've also been messing around with options recently. Large transactions really depend on liquidity, or slippage can make you lose your mind. Your fee comparison is so detailed, it seems you've been scammed before... During the October 11 settlement, I was there too. To be honest, the spreads on those small exchanges are just not worth looking at; you really need to find reliable ones.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 2025-12-27 09:30

Large options trading indeed depends on liquidity; I've also fallen into pitfalls before.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 2025-12-27 09:29

Large options with poor liquidity mean you're just giving away money. This guy has figured it out, smart.

View OriginalReply0