2025-12-27 11:21:19

Institutional heavy predictions are here. According to the latest industry research report, despite several fluctuations in the crypto market mid-year, Bitcoin is still expected to reach new highs next year in the long term. An even more aggressive prediction is that by the year after next, Bitcoin could surge to $250,000.

What is the logic behind these judgments? Continuous increase in institutional allocation to crypto assets is a key support. Although there is indeed short-term correction pressure in the market, the overall trend adopted by these institutions has not changed; instead, it is laying the foundation for the next round of market growth. In other words, the current volatility may be a buildup rather than a sign of decline. For investors, this means that persistence and patience might be more important than frequent trading.

BTC0,13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PositionPhobia

· 2025-12-30 11:14

250,000? Are you dreaming? Do institutions believe everything they say? I just want to ask, why does the foundation built during this round of the market only take effect next year?

View OriginalReply0

SchrödingersNode

· 2025-12-30 11:11

$250,000? Dream on. I believe it will hit a new high next year, and I haven't seen it double in the following year. Institutional entry is indeed aggressive, but don't take it as a rule. Volatility is just volatility. Who dares say it's not a sign of recession? 坚持耐心？我看大多数人都是频繁交易血赔，还不如躺着hold呢

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 2025-12-30 01:06

According to data, the indicator of institutional allocation increment is indeed worth paying attention to, but the rationale behind the $250,000 target price still seems somewhat weak. Based on on-chain data, institutional entry is indeed reflected in several dimensions: growth of large wallets, increased outflows from exchanges, and rising proportion of long-term holders. From these three perspectives, all of them point to a bullish outlook. The question is—can the short-term correction pressure really be completely ignored? A risk warning: in history, every time there was a "building up" phase, someone said the same thing. But on the other hand, if we look at the 3-5 year cycle, the overall trend of institutions has not changed. It's just that traders who trade frequently have long been educated, and persistence has become a rare quality.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 2025-12-27 11:51

per my analysis, $250k btc in two years is taxonomically optimistic... let me pull up my spreadsheet but the institutional inflow data doesn't actually support that timeline ngl

Reply0

MetaEggplant

· 2025-12-27 11:40

$250,000? The institution's move is indeed bold, but I think it depends on what the big funds are really doing. --- Accumulation or trapping people, it all depends on whether this round of allocation by the institutions is real money or just talk. --- Persistence and patience... sounds easy, but few can hold on until next year. --- Alright, it's another story of waiting until the year after next. I just want to know how to operate in the short term. --- This logic sounds reasonable, but I'm just worried about getting caught again. --- Institutions are increasing their holdings, right? Then why is the price still kneeling here? --- Hey, is this accumulation or a trap? Can you be less ambiguous?

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 2025-12-27 11:35

$250,000? Just hear it out. I just want to know if institutions are really buying now. Institutions sound good, but has the real money actually been invested, or are they just talking? Is it building momentum or just harvesting profits? We'll see soon enough. Both institutions and long-term holdings—what about my money in the short term? Persistence and patience... my wallet can't hold out much longer.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaLeaker

· 2025-12-27 11:29

$250,000? Haha, institutions are starting to spin stories again. I'll just listen to a cross-talk show. --- Accumulation or chopping leeks, only time will tell. Whoever dares to go all-in now is the real brave one. --- Institutional allocation ≠ retail investors can make money. Don't be fooled by this rhetoric. --- The short-term correction pressure is described too smoothly. Next year's new high is just a headline, and $25,000 in the year after next is a pipe dream. --- Persistence and patience? Sorry, I only have account balances and losing orders to teach me. --- It's always the same logic. I want to see how much position the institutions have added before they start bragging.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetScholar

· 2025-12-27 11:25

$250,000? Dreaming, haha --- Institutions are just hyping up again. I just want to know who will take over at 250,000 --- Building momentum? Or trapping people? I'm already tired of this pullback --- Sounds good, but let's see how the institutions are actually operating --- Persistence and patience? Uh... my margin can't wait that long --- They said the same thing two years ago, and now? --- $250,000 is indeed tempting, but the question is, will it last until then? --- Institutional allocations are increasing? Then retail allocations should be decreasing, right?

View OriginalReply0